Literature DB >> 21606634

Analgesic efficacy of forced coughing versus local anesthesia during cervical punch biopsy.

M Murat Naki1, Olus Api, Hasniye Celik Acioglu, Mine Guray Uzun, Bulent Kars, Orhan Unal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare local anesthesia and forced coughing in terms of subjective pain perception during cervical punch biopsy.
METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 114 patients (mean age: 38.9 ± 9.0 years) scheduled for colposcopically directed cervical punch biopsy were randomly assigned to local anesthesia (n = 39), forced coughing (n = 39) and control (n = 36) groups. Pain perception was measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) during the insertion of the speculum, injection of the local anesthetic to the cervix and the taking of the first cervical biopsy, as well as for the overall pain perceived during the entire procedure.
RESULTS: Experimental groups were similar in age, gravidity, parity and prior curettage. The pain score obtained during the first cervical biopsy was significantly lower if local anesthesia was applied (p = 0.016). Groups were similar in other pain subscores. The duration of the entire procedure was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in the local anesthesia group, while it was not significantly different in forced coughing patients compared to controls.
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia, but not forced coughing, provides significant pain relief during cervical biopsy. Based on similarity to control data in terms of pain relief and shortening of the operation, forced coughing per se seems related neither to pain relief nor a faster cervical biopsy.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606634     DOI: 10.1159/000320842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  5 in total

1.  Cervical Strip Biopsy for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions: a Valid Alternative to Conventional Punch Technique.

Authors:  A Schneider; K Wagner; C Rakozy; C Stolte; P Bothur-Schäfer; T Welcker; N Choly; A Roesgen; H Rothe; G Böhmer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Intrauterine anesthesia for gynecologic procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Matthew L Zerden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Effectiveness of Intrauterine Lignocaine in Addition to Paracervical Block for Pain Relief during Dilatation and Curettage, and Fractional Curettage.

Authors:  Aashima Arora; Ajitabh Shukla; Subhas Chander Saha
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-01-22

4.  Comparison of pain and proper sample status according to usage of tenaculum and analgesia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Cihan Comba; Gökhan Demirayak; Sakir Volkan Erdogan; Ibrahim Karaca; Omer Demir; Oguz Guler; Isa Aykut Ozdemir
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Efficacy of Listening to Music on Pain Reduction during Colposcopy-Directed Cervical Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lalita Pradit; Charuwan Tantipalakorn; Kittipat Charoenkwan; Prapaporn Suprasert; Jatupol Srisomboon; Tanarat Muangmool
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.