Literature DB >> 21606444

Effect of prenatal stress on subsequent response to mixing stress and a lipopolysaccharide challenge in pigs.

D C Lay1, H G Kattesh, J E Cunnick, M J Daniels, G Kranendonk, K A McMunn, M J Toscano, M P Roberts.   

Abstract

Sows subjected to prenatal stress have been found to produce offspring that have altered responses to stress. Our objective was to determine if exposing a sow to stress would alter the response of the offspring to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 2 mo of age or their response to mixing stress at 4 mo of age. Sow treatments consisted of intravenous injections of ACTH (1 IU/kg of BW), exposure to rough handling for a 10-min duration (rough), or no treatment (control) once per week from d 42 to 77 of gestation. At 2 mo of age, pigs from each treatment, 1 per litter (n = 21, 17, and 15 for the ACTH, rough, and control treatments, respectively), were challenged with 2 μg of LPS/kg of BW or saline, or served as a noninjected control. Their behavioral response to a human approach test and salivary cortisol were measured. At 4 mo of age, 1 pig from each treatment (n = 14, 14, and 15 for the ACTH, rough, and control treatments, respectively) was taken from its home pen and placed in a pen of unfamiliar pigs. At this time, a punch biopsy wound (6 × 6 mm) was created to measure the ability of the pig to heal the wound. At this same time, each pig received a 1-mL intramuscular injection of 20% ovine red blood cells (oRBC), and then a second injection of oRBC at 21 d postmixing. Blood samples were collected 3 times per week for 2 wk and then once a week for 4 more weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for cortisol, porcine corticosteroid-binding globulin, antibody response to oRBC, and nitric oxide production by macrophages. Behavior was recorded during the first 5 d after mixing. All pigs in the LPS challenge responded with characteristic sickness behavior; however, pigs in the rough treatment showed less sickness behavior than those in the other 2 treatments (P < 0.05). Maternal stress treatment did not affect (P < 0.43) salivary cortisol. Pigs from all treatments responded similarly to mixing stress with regard to cortisol, porcine corticosteroid-binding globulin, antibody titers, nitric oxide production, and hematology measures, and all pigs experienced the same amount of aggression in response to mixing. Without altering peripheral measures of stress responsivity, prenatal stress enhanced the ability of pigs to cope with a simulated immune challenge, which could prove to be an adaptation to challenging environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606444     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Effect of lipopolysaccharide-induced immune stimulation and maternal fish oil and microalgae supplementation during late pregnancy on nursery pig hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function1.

Authors:  Lan You; Alison V Lee; Se-Young Oh; Rebecca E Fisher-Heffernan; Michelle Edwards; Kees de Lange; Niel A Karrow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparison of influenza A virus infection in high- and low-birth-weight pigs using morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Susan E Detmer; Rayna E Gunvaldsen; John C Harding
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation and fetal susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Andrea Ladinig; George Foxcroft; Carolyn Ashley; Joan K Lunney; Graham Plastow; John C S Harding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of transport stress on cattle travelling a long distance (≈648 km), from Jessore (Indian border) to Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mahabub Alam; Md Hasanuzzaman; Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan; Tofazzal Md Rakib; Md Emran Hossain; Md Harun Rashid; Md Abu Sayeed; Lindsay B Philips; Md Ahasanul Hoque
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2018-06-26

5.  Review: Early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs.

Authors:  A Prunier; X Averos; I Dimitrov; S A Edwards; E Hillmann; M Holinger; V Ilieski; R Leming; C Tallet; S P Turner; M Zupan; I Camerlink
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of Enrichment and Repeated Mixing on Resilience in Pigs.

Authors:  Lu Luo; Lisette E van der Zande; Manon A van Marwijk; Egbert Frank Knol; T Bas Rodenburg; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Severine P Parois
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 7.  Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.

Authors:  Martyna Ewa Lagoda; Joanna Marchewka; Keelin O'Driscoll; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

8.  Effects of L-proline on the Growth Performance, and Blood Parameters in Weaned Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged Pigs.

Authors:  Ping Kang; Lili Zhang; Yongqing Hou; Binying Ding; Dan Yi; Lei Wang; Huiling Zhu; Yulan Liu; Yulong Yin; Guoyao Wu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.