Literature DB >> 21606430

Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study.

Xavier García-Del-Muro1, Antonio López-Pousa, Joan Maurel, Javier Martín, Javier Martínez-Trufero, Antonio Casado, Auxiliadora Gómez-España, Joaquín Fra, Josefina Cruz, Andrés Poveda, Andrés Meana, Carlos Pericay, Ricardo Cubedo, Jordi Rubió, Ana De Juan, Nuria Laínez, Juan Antonio Carrasco, Raquel de Andrés, José M Buesa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine plus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in a randomized, multicenter, phase II study using DTIC alone as a control arm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously treated advanced STS were randomly assigned to receive either fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) at 1800 mg/m2 followed by DTIC at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, or DTIC alone at 1200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point of the study was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months.
RESULTS: From November 2005 to September 2008, 113 patients were included. PFR at 3 months was 56% for gemcitabine plus DTIC versus 37% for DTIC alone (P = .001). Median progression-free survival was 4.2 months versus 2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.86; P = .005), and median overall survival was 16.8 months versus 8.2 months (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.90; P = .014); both favored the arm of gemcitabine plus DTIC. Gemcitabine plus DTIC was also associated with a higher objective response or higher stable disease rate than was DTIC alone (49% v 25%; P = .009). Severe toxicities were uncommon, and treatment discontinuation for toxicity was rare. Granulocytopenia was the more common serious adverse event, but febrile neutropenia was uncommon. Asthenia, emesis, and stomatitis were the most frequent nonhematologic effects.
CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC is active and well tolerated in patients with STS, providing in this phase II randomized trial superior progression-free survival and overall survival than DTIC alone. This regimen constitutes a valuable therapeutic alternative for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606430     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  70 in total

1.  Targeted therapies: pazopanib for soft-tissue sarcoma: a PALETTE of data emerges.

Authors:  Isabelle Ray-Coquard; David Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the management of adult soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Xavier García del Muro Solans; Javier Martín Broto; Pilar Lianes Barragán; Ricardo Cubedo Cervera
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  [Soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors].

Authors:  P Reichardt
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Sirolimus in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) Study.

Authors:  Juan Martin-Liberal; Antonio López-Pousa; Javier Martínez-Trufero; Javier Martín-Broto; Ricardo Cubedo; Javier Lavernia; Andrés Redondo; José Antonio López-Martín; Nùria Mulet-Margalef; Xavier Sanjuan; Òscar M Tirado; Xavier Garcia-Del-Muro
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review: uterine and ovarian leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Brigitte A Barrette; Klaus Baumann; David Gaffney; Anne L Hamilton; Jae-Weon Kim; Johanna U Maenpaa; Patricia Pautier; Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui; Anneke M Westermann; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 6.  Management of metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Salvage Therapy in Advanced Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Comandone; Fausto Petrelli; Antonella Boglione; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 8.  Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma.

Authors:  Khalid El-Khalfaoui; Andreas du Bois; Florian Heitz; Christian Kurzeder; Jalid Sehouli; Philipp Harter
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Randomized multicenter and stratified phase II study of gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic or relapsed leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma Group Study (TAXOGEM study).

Authors:  Patricia Pautier; Anne Floquet; Nicolas Penel; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Nicolas Isambert; Annie Rey; Emmanuelle Bompas; Angela Cioffi; Corinne Delcambre; Didier Cupissol; Françoise Collin; Jean-Yves Blay; Marta Jimenez; Florence Duffaud
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-08-20

Review 10.  Systemic treatment options for radiation-associated sarcomas.

Authors:  Mark A Dickson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.