Literature DB >> 21606413

Cytarabine dose of 36 g/m² compared with 12 g/m² within first consolidation in acute myeloid leukemia: results of patients enrolled onto the prospective randomized AML96 study.

Markus Schaich1, Christoph Röllig, Silke Soucek, Michael Kramer, Christian Thiede, Brigitte Mohr, Uta Oelschlaegel, Norbert Schmitz, Reingard Stuhlmann, Hannes Wandt, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Walter Aulitzky, Martin Kaufmann, Heinrich Bodenstein, Joachim Tischler, Anthony Ho, Alwin Krämer, Martin Bornhäuser, Johannes Schetelig, Gerhard Ehninger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the optimal cumulative dose of cytarabine for treatment of young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) within a prospective multicenter treatment trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2003, 933 patients (median age, 47 years; range 15 to 60 years) with untreated AML were randomly assigned at diagnosis to receive cytarabine within the first consolidation therapy at either a intermediate-dose of 12 g/m² (I-MAC) or a high-dose of 36 g/m² (H-MAC) combined with mitoxantrone. Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or intermediate-dose cytarabine (10 g/m²) were offered as second consolidation. Patients with a matched donor could receive an allogeneic transplantation in a risk-adapted manner.
RESULTS: After double induction therapy including intermediate-dose cytarabine (10 g/m²), mitoxantrone, etoposide, and amsacrine, complete remission was achieved in 66% of patients. In the primary efficacy analysis population, a consolidation with either I-MAC or H-MAC did not result in significant differences in the 5-year overall (30% v 33%; P = .77) or disease-free survival (37% v 38%; P = .86) according to the intention-to-treat analysis. Besides a prolongation of neutropenia and higher transfusion demands in the H-MAC arm, rates of serious adverse events were comparable in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In young adults with AML receiving intermediate-dose cytarabine induction, intensification of the cytarabine dose beyond 12 g/m² within first consolidation did not improve treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606413     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.7303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

Review 1.  Inching toward cure of acute myeloid leukemia: a summary of the progress made in the last 50 years.

Authors:  Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Reply to M.C. Chamberlain.

Authors:  James L Rubenstein; Bruce D Cheson; Sin-Ho Jung; Lawrence D Kaplan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  [What is recommended in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia?]

Authors:  F Thol
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  An mTORC1/2 dual inhibitor, AZD2014, acts as a lysosomal function activator and enhances gemtuzumab ozogamicin-induced apoptosis in primary human leukemia cells.

Authors:  Yu Mizutani; Aki Inase; Yimamu Maimaitili; Yoshiharu Miyata; Akihito Kitao; Hisayuki Matsumoto; Koji Kawaguchi; Ako Higashime; Hideaki Goto; Keiji Kurata; Kimikazu Yakushijin; Hironobu Minami; Hiroshi Matsuoka
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Optimal therapy for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

Authors:  Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Outcomes of Intensive Treatment of Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Retrospective Study From a Single Centre.

Authors:  Jayachandran Perumal Kalaiyarasi; Prasanth Ganesan; Krishnarathinam Kannan; Trivadi S Ganesan; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Manikandan Dhanushkodi; S Krupashankar; Nikita Mehra; Tenali Gnana Sagar
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Comparison of Mitoxantrone in Combination with Intermediate-dose Cytarabine versus High-dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapies for Young Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Favorable and Intermediate Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Ji-Hao Zhou; Hai-Qing Lin; Qi Shen; Li-Na Hu; Guo-Qiang Li; Xiong-Fei Sun; Xin-You Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 9.  How I treat pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Delivering HDAC over 3 or 5 days as consolidation in AML impacts health care resource consumption but not outcome.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Dumas; Sarah Bertoli; Emilie Bérard; Thibaut Leguay; Suzanne Tavitian; Jean Galtier; Camille Alric; Audrey Bidet; Eric Delabesse; Jean Baptiste Rieu; Jean-Philippe Vial; François Vergez; Nicolas Lechevalier; Isabelle Luquet; Emilie Klein; Audrey Sarry; Héloïse Rey; Anne-Charlotte de Grande; Fabien Despas; Arnaud Pigneux; Christian Récher
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.