Literature DB >> 21605927

Muscle work is increased in pre-swing during hemiparetic walking.

Carrie L Peterson1, Steven A Kautz, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle mechanical work is likely affected by gait abnormalities in hemiparetic walking during the paretic pre-swing phase (i.e., double support phase preceding paretic toe-off). Previous experimental studies suggest that muscle work may be decreased in the paretic leg, but paretic work may have been underestimated since experimental approaches based on net joint moments do not account for co-contraction of antagonist muscles. Also, whether the non-paretic leg does more work compared to control subjects at matched speeds and how work generation may differ between hemiparetic subjects walking with different self-selected speeds remains unknown.
METHODS: Three-dimensional forward dynamics simulations of two representative hemiparetic subjects walking with different self-selected speeds (i.e., limited community=0.45 m/s and community walkers=0.9 m/s) and a speed and age-matched control subject were generated to quantify musculotendon (fiber and in-series tendon) work during paretic pre-swing.
FINDINGS: Total paretic and non-paretic fiber work were increased in both the limited community and community hemiparetic walkers compared to the control. Increased fiber work in the limited community walker was primarily related to decreased fiber and tendon work by the paretic plantar flexors requiring compensatory work by other muscles. Increased fiber work in the community walker was primarily related to increased work by the hip abductors and adductors.
INTERPRETATION: The hemiparetic walkers would expend more metabolic energy during pre-swing if the hemiparetic and control subjects were to perform work with the same mechanical efficiency. These results may partly explain the increased metabolic cost of hemiparetic walkers compared to nondisabled walkers at matched speeds.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605927      PMCID: PMC3159858          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  36 in total

1.  Speed related changes in muscle activity from normal to very slow walking speeds.

Authors:  A R den Otter; A C H Geurts; T Mulder; J Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Work and power in gait of stroke patients.

Authors:  S J Olney; M P Griffin; T N Monga; I D McBride
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Abnormalities in the temporal patterning of lower extremity muscle activity in hemiparetic gait.

Authors:  A R Den Otter; A C H Geurts; Th Mulder; J Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking.

Authors:  Masaki Ishikawa; Paavo V Komi; Michael J Grey; Vesa Lepola; Gert-Peter Bruggemann
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-04-21

5.  Efficiency of work production by spastic muscles.

Authors:  G G Stoquart; C Detrembleur; H Nielens; T M Lejeune
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Pre-swing deficits in forward propulsion, swing initiation and power generation by individual muscles during hemiparetic walking.

Authors:  Carrie L Peterson; Allison L Hall; Steven A Kautz; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Different types of disturbed motor control in gait of hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  E Knutsson; C Richards
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Claire T Farley; Thomas J Roberts; Marco Temaner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-07-16

9.  Evaluation of postural stability in the elderly with stroke.

Authors:  Hélène Corriveau; Réjean Hébert; Michel Raîche; François Prince
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.

Authors:  J Perry; M Garrett; J K Gronley; S J Mulroy
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  6 in total

1.  Functional implications of impaired control of submaximal hip flexion following stroke.

Authors:  Allison S Hyngstrom; Henry R Kuhnen; Kiersten M Kirking; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 2.  Validation of Hill-type muscle models in relation to neuromuscular recruitment and force-velocity properties: predicting patterns of in vivo muscle force.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; James M Wakeling; Sabrina S Lee; Allison S Arnold
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function.

Authors:  Antonie J van den Bogert; Thomas Geijtenbeek; Oshri Even-Zohar; Frans Steenbrink; Elizabeth C Hardin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Revisiting the mechanics and energetics of walking in individuals with chronic hemiparesis following stroke: from individual limbs to lower limb joints.

Authors:  Dominic James Farris; Austin Hampton; Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Principal Characteristics of Affected and Unaffected Side Trunk Movement and Gait Event Parameters during Hemiplegic Stroke Gait with IMU Sensor.

Authors:  Jeong-Woo Seo; Seul-Gee Kim; Joong Il Kim; Boncho Ku; Kahye Kim; Sangkwan Lee; Jaeuk U Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  The Effects of Varying Ankle Foot Orthosis Stiffness on Gait in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy Who Walk with Excessive Knee Flexion.

Authors:  Yvette L Kerkum; Annemieke I Buizer; Josien C van den Noort; Jules G Becher; Jaap Harlaar; Merel-Anne Brehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.