Literature DB >> 21605922

Description of 44 biosecurity errors while entering and exiting poultry barns based on video surveillance in Quebec, Canada.

Manon Racicot1, Daniel Venne, André Durivage, Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of biosecurity measures depends largely on the consistency of their applications by all those involved in poultry production. Unfortunately, poor biosecurity compliance has been reported repeatedly in poultry, as well in all other major animal productions. As part of a larger study, we conducted an investigation on eight poultry farms in Quebec, Canada, to evaluate compliance of existing biosecurity measures using hidden cameras. The objectives were to evaluate and describe the application of biosecurity measures when entering and exiting poultry barns. A total of 44 different mistakes were observed from 883 visits done by 102 different individuals. On average, four errors were recorded per visit. The maximum number of errors made by one individual during one visit was 14. People observed over several visits made on average six different errors. Twenty-seven out of the 44 errors (61.4%) were related to area delimitation (clean versus contaminated), six to boots (13.6%), five to hand washing (11.4%), three to coveralls (6.8%) and three to logbooks (6.8%). The nature and frequency of errors suggest a lack of understanding of biosecurity principles. There is thus a need to improve biosecurity training by making educational material available to all poultry personnel demonstrating why and how to apply biosecurity measures.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605922     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  9 in total

1.  "Catch 22": Biosecurity awareness, interpretation and practice amongst poultry catchers.

Authors:  Caroline Millman; Rob Christley; Dan Rigby; Diana Dennis; Sarah J O'Brien; Nicola Williams
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.

Authors:  Arata Hidano; Gareth Enticott; Robert M Christley; M Carolyn Gates
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-21

3.  Bactericidal efficacy of a quaternary ammonium compound with food additive grade calcium hydroxide toward Salmonella Infantis and Escherichia coli on abiotic carriers.

Authors:  Md Shahin Alam; Satoru Takahashi; Mariko Ito; Miyuki Komura; Mayuko Suzuki; Natthanan Sangsriratanakul; Dany Shoham; Kazuaki Takehara
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Characterization of commercial poultry farms in Mexico: Towards a better understanding of biosecurity practices and antibiotic usage patterns.

Authors:  Erika Ornelas-Eusebio; Gary García-Espinosa; Karine Laroucau; Gina Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Biosecurity in the Control of Campylobacter: A Qualitative Study of the Attitudes and Perceptions of UK Broiler Farm Workers.

Authors:  Alexandra Royden; Robert Christley; Alison Prendiville; Nicola J Williams
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Farm management practices, biosecurity and influenza a virus detection in swine farms: a comprehensive study in colombia.

Authors:  Ciuoderis-Aponte Karl; Diaz Andres; Muskus Carlos; Mario Peña; Hernández-Ortiz Juan; Osorio Jorge
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-10-05

7.  On-farm biosecurity as perceived by professionals visiting Swedish farms.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg-Lewerin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 8.  A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Lisa Waddell; David Léger; Eduardo Taboada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Social Cues on Biosecurity Compliance in Livestock Facilities: Evidence From Experimental Simulations.

Authors:  Luke Trinity; Scott C Merrill; Eric M Clark; Christopher J Koliba; Asim Zia; Gabriela Bucini; Julia M Smith
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.