| Literature DB >> 21605446 |
Toan K Tran1, Chuc T K Nguyen, Hinh D Nguyen, Bo Eriksson, Goran Bondjers, Karin Gottvall, Henry Ascher, Max Petzold.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of antenatal care (ANC) varies between countries and in different settings within each country. Most previous studies of ANC in Vietnam have been cross-sectional, and conducted in rural areas before the year 2000. This study aims to compare the pattern and the adequacy of ANC used in rural and urban Vietnam following two cohorts of pregnant women.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21605446 PMCID: PMC3224373 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Figure 1Women identified and included in the study.
Definition and classification of ANC adequacy
| Indicators | Adequate use | Inadequate use |
|---|---|---|
| Number of ANC visits | At least three visits | Less than three visits |
| Time for fist visit | During first trimester | After first trimester |
| Content of ANC | ||
| Use of all core services at least once | No use of at least one of six core services | |
| Yes or No | Yes or No |
* Including fundal height, abdominal circumference and heart rate measurement
Background characteristics of the women (%)
| Variables | Urban (n = 814) | Rural (n = 1318) |
|---|---|---|
| < 20 | 0.6 | 4.2 |
| 20-24 | 12.8 | 41.6 |
| 25-29 | 46.9 | 34.5 |
| 30-34 | 30.0 | 12.9 |
| 35+ | 9.7 | 6.8 |
| Mean age of nullipara (95% CI) | 26.7(26.4-27.0) | 23.5(23.2-23.8) |
| Secondary or less | 5.9 | 56.7 |
| High school | 31.8 | 26.6 |
| Higher than high school | 62.3 | 16.7 |
| Farmers | 2.5 | 64.4 |
| Office staff | 57.4 | 10.2 |
| Workers | 6.5 | 10.1 |
| Business/services | 20.3 | 10.5 |
| Others | 13.4 | 4.8 |
| Yes | 10.4 | 4.6 |
| No | 89.6 | 95.4 |
| Married | 99.1 | 98.1 |
| Unmarried | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| 1 | 56.5 | 46.6 |
| 2 | 39.1 | 35.4 |
| 3+ | 4.4 | 18.1 |
| Yes | 11.3 | 13.4 |
| No | 88.7 | 86.7 |
Frequency of ANC visits, by parity (%)
| Number of visits | Urban | Rural | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nullipara | Multipara | Total | Nullipara | Multipara | Total | |
| 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 5.1 | 8.8 | 7.1 |
| 2 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 10.4 | 14.9 | 12.8 |
| 3+ | 97.6 | 96.6 | 97.2 | 82.6 | 72.4 | 77.2 |
| Mean* | 7.9 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 4.4 |
*p < 0.001 for t-test for mean values between areas and within area.
Content of ANC used by nullipara and multipara women (%)
| Urban | Rural | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANC services | Nullipara (n = 460) | Multipara (n = 354) | Total (n = 814) | Nullipara (n = 614) | Multipara (n = 704) | Total (n = 1318) |
| Fetal examination* | 99.1 | 99.4 | 99.3 | 82.8 | 77.1 | 79.8 |
| Body weight and height measurement* | 98.3 | 98.9 | 98.5 | 58.7 | 56.7 | 57.6 |
| Blood pressure assessment* | 97.8 | 97.7 | 97.8 | 60.7 | 57.7 | 59.1 |
| Urine test* | 89.3 | 86.7 | 88.1 | 38.1 | 33.2 | 35.5 |
| Tetanus vaccination | 92.6 | 92.1 | 92.4 | 94.3 | 89.4 | 91.7 |
| Health consultation* | 87.0 | 81.6 | 84.6 | 24.9 | 22.3 | 23.6 |
| Folic & Iron supplement* | 96.7 | 94.9 | 96.0 | 87.5 | 73.3 | 80.0 |
| Blood sample test* | 74.8 | 72.0 | 73.6 | 22.4 | 17.9 | 20.0 |
| Ultrasound scan* | 99.6 | 99.4 | 99.5 | 98.5 | 95.3 | 96.8 |
| 6.0 (n = 71) | 6.0 (n = 46) | 6.0 (n = 117) | 4.0 (n = 106) | 3.0 (n = 116) | 3.5 (n = 222) | |
*p < 0.001 for Chi square test for urban - rural comparison
**p < 0.001 for t-test for comparison of mean values between the two areas
Figure 2Percentages of women who used ANC from different providers.
Type of ANC utilization by nullipara and multipara women (%)
| Urban | Rural | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nullipara (n = 458) | Multipara (n = 354) | Total (n = 812) | Nullipara (n = 602) | Multipara (n = 677) | Total (n = 1279) | |
| CHC/Maternity* | 7.4 | 10.2 | 8.6 | 69.3 | 67.5 | 68.3 |
| District hospital* | 7.0 | 5.7 | 6.4 | 58.1 | 56.1 | 57.1 |
| Provincial hospital* | 46.3 | 40.4 | 43.7 | 6.8 | 4.9 | 5.8 |
| Central hospital* | 72.3 | 68.6 | 70.7 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
| Private clinic* | 38.9 | 28.0 | 34.1 | 65.5 | 62.6 | 64.0 |
| Private hospital | 15.5 | 13.0 | 14.4 | 13.3 | 11.2 | 12.2 |
| Others | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Only public* | 52.2 | 62.3 | 56.6 | 28.9 | 31.9 | 30.5 |
| Only private* | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 8.7 | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Both* | 42.8 | 32.9 | 38.5 | 62.4 | 58.5 | 60.4 |
*: p < 0.001 for Chi square test for rural - urban comparison
Expenditure related to the use of ANC (mean, 95% CI; 1.000 VND)
| Women used ANC at | Urban | Rural | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Total expenditure | Expenditure per visit | n | Total expenditure | Expenditure per visit | |
| Only public | 459 | 968.0 (882.5-1053.4) | 143.8 (131.6-156.0) | 386 | 94.4 (66.9-121.9) | 27.2 (20.4-34.0) |
| Only private | 40 | 958.9 (700.0-1217.6) | 122.8 (103.3-142.2) | 117 | 137.3 (108.7-165.8) | 40.1 (35.1-45.1) |
| Both public and private | 312 | 1210.5 (1109.7-1311.2) | 138.9 (129.1-148.6) | 764 | 181.8 (168.7-194.8) | 33.3 (31.5-35.1) |
| All women | 811 | 1059.5 (995.8-1123.1) | 140.7 (132.8-148.6) | 1267 | 149.5 (137.6-161.4) | 31.7 (29.3-34.1) |