Nicola Magnavita1, Tarja Heponiemi. 1. Institute of Occupational Medicine, Catholic University of Medicine, Rome, Italy. nicolamagnavita@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nurses and nursing students are exposed to workplace violence. OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics and effects of violence in nursing students and nurses in order to assess the phenomenon and take preventive action. METHODS: A retrospective survey was conducted in three Italian university schools of nursing. At the end of a lecture, 346 of 349 students agreed to fill out a questionnaire that included domains on violence, mental health, job stress, and organizational justice. This group was compared with 275 nurses from a general hospital (94.2% participation rate). RESULTS: The prevalence of subjects reporting at least one upsetting episode of physical or verbal violence during their lifetime activity in clinical settings was 43% in nurses and 34% in nursing students. Nurses reported more physical assaults (odds ratio [OR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-6.18), threats (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.39-5.79), and sexual harassment (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.15-5.54) during the previous 12 months than students. Nurses were mostly assaulted or harassed by patients or their relatives and friends ("external" violence), whereas students often reported verbal and also physical violence on the part of colleagues, staff, and others, including teachers, doctors, and supervisors ("internal" violence). Verbal violence was associated with high levels of psychological problems, as measured by the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, in both students and nurses. Verbal violence was also associated with high job strain, low social support, and low organizational justice, but only among nursing students. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive action is urgently needed to control patient-to-worker and worker-to-worker violence in clinical settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Not only nurses, but also nursing students, would benefit from multilevel programs of violence prevention.
BACKGROUND: Nurses and nursing students are exposed to workplace violence. OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics and effects of violence in nursing students and nurses in order to assess the phenomenon and take preventive action. METHODS: A retrospective survey was conducted in three Italian university schools of nursing. At the end of a lecture, 346 of 349 students agreed to fill out a questionnaire that included domains on violence, mental health, job stress, and organizational justice. This group was compared with 275 nurses from a general hospital (94.2% participation rate). RESULTS: The prevalence of subjects reporting at least one upsetting episode of physical or verbal violence during their lifetime activity in clinical settings was 43% in nurses and 34% in nursing students. Nurses reported more physical assaults (odds ratio [OR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-6.18), threats (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.39-5.79), and sexual harassment (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.15-5.54) during the previous 12 months than students. Nurses were mostly assaulted or harassed by patients or their relatives and friends ("external" violence), whereas students often reported verbal and also physical violence on the part of colleagues, staff, and others, including teachers, doctors, and supervisors ("internal" violence). Verbal violence was associated with high levels of psychological problems, as measured by the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, in both students and nurses. Verbal violence was also associated with high job strain, low social support, and low organizational justice, but only among nursing students. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive action is urgently needed to control patient-to-worker and worker-to-worker violence in clinical settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Not only nurses, but also nursing students, would benefit from multilevel programs of violence prevention.
Authors: Ehsan Teymourzadeh; Arash Rashidian; Mohammad Arab; Ali Akbari-Sari; Seyyed Mostafa Hakimzadeh Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2014-10-04
Authors: Lydia E Hamblin; Lynnette Essenmacher; Joel Ager; Mark Upfal; Mark Luborsky; Jim Russell; Judith Arnetz Journal: Workplace Health Saf Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 1.413
Authors: Mareike Adler; Sylvie Vincent-Höper; Claudia Vaupel; Sabine Gregersen; Anja Schablon; Albert Nienhaus Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390