Literature DB >> 21605217

Mating stimulates female feeding: testing the implications for the evolution of nuptial gifts.

J C Perry1.   

Abstract

Nutritional benefits from nuptial gifts have been difficult to detect in some species, raising the question: what maintains nuptial feeding when gifts do not benefit females? The sensory trap hypothesis proposes that nuptial feeding may be explained by pre-existing sensory responses that predispose females to ingest gifts. Recent studies have shown that male seminal proteins can induce a nonspecific increase in female feeding after mating, which may represent a sensory trap for nuptial feeding if it results in increased intake of post-mating gifts. I tested these ideas using female beetles that ingest a spermatophore after mating. I show that males stimulate strongly increased female feeding post-mating. However, there was little evidence for dose dependence in the feeding response that could allow males to stimulate feeding beyond the female optimum. Moreover, the post-mating feeding response could not explain nuptial feeding: despite feeding more in general, newly mated females were less likely than nonmated females to ingest spermatophore gifts.
© 2011 The Author. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605217     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02299.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  4 in total

1.  Spermatophore consumption in a cephalopod.

Authors:  Benjamin J Wegener; Devi Stuart-Fox; Mark D Norman; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Laura Sirot; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Mating changes the female dietary preference in the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Yusuke Tsukamoto; Hiroshi Kataoka; Hiromichi Nagasawa; Shinji Nagata
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Extreme costs of mating for male two-spot ladybird beetles.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Crystal T Tse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.