Literature DB >> 21604875

Detection of emotional faces is modulated by the direction of eye gaze.

Maarten Milders1, Jari K Hietanen, Jukka M Leppänen, Marc Braun.   

Abstract

Emotionally expressive faces have shown enhanced detectability over neutral faces, but little is known about the effect of eye gaze on detecting the presence of emotional faces. Emotional expressions and gaze direction are both cues to the intentions of another person, and gaze direction has been shown to affect recognition accuracy and perceived intensity of emotional faces. The current study showed that fearful faces were detected more frequently with an averted gaze than with a direct gaze in an attentional blink task, whereas angry and happy faces were detected more frequently with a direct gaze than with an averted gaze. The results are in line with the shared signal hypothesis and appraisal theory and suggest that selection for awareness was based on a rapid evaluation of the intentions of another person as conveyed by their facial expression and gaze direction. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604875     DOI: 10.1037/a0022901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  20 in total

1.  Physiological regulation and social-emotional processing in female carriers of the FMR1 premutation.

Authors:  Molly Winston; Kritika Nayar; Abigail L Hogan; Jamie Barstein; Chelsea La Valle; Kevin Sharp; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Molly Losh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 2.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Sex-related differences in behavioral and amygdalar responses to compound facial threat cues.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Reginald B Adams; Cody A Cushing; Jasmine Boshyan; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Cristina Narganes-Pineda; Ana B Chica; Juan Lupiáñez; Andrea Marotta
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-22

6.  Social Vision: Applying a Social-Functional Approach to Face and Expression Perception.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Daniel N Albohn; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14

7.  Impaired eye contact in the FMR1 premutation is not associated with social anxiety or the broad autism phenotype.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Alexis Ruber; Jane E Roberts
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Hierarchical Encoding of Social Cues in Primate Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Elyse L Morin; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Mark Stokes; Leslie G Ungerleider; Andrew H Bell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The influences of face inversion and facial expression on sensitivity to eye contact in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Daphne Maurer; Andrew J Calder; Gillian Rhodes; Jennifer A Walsh; Matthew V Pachai; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-11

10.  How do we update faces? Effects of gaze direction and facial expressions on working memory updating.

Authors:  Caterina Artuso; Paola Palladino; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.