Literature DB >> 21604356

Ambivalence in living liver donors.

Mary Ann Simpson1, Julia Kendrick, Jennifer E Verbesey, Denise S Morin, Mary Amanda Dew, Agnes Trabucco, James J Pomposelli, Elizabeth A Pomfret.   

Abstract

All right hepatic lobe (RHL) donors in our program are asked to participate in a longitudinal quality-of-life study that begins at their evaluation and continues throughout the first postdonation year. Here we report the characteristics of donor candidates who completed the donation process despite ambivalence. In all, 183 RHL candidates consented, and 133 became donors. Ambivalent donors (ADs; n = 45) identified themselves through verbal statements or written comments, or they were identified by staff during the evaluation. ADs were predominantly male (73.3%), were older than unambivalent donors (UADs; >35 years: 76% of ADs versus 53% of UADs, P = 0.008), and were well educated (college graduate: 60% of ADs versus 17% of UADs, P = 0.01). Brother-to-brother and son-to-father combinations were most common among ADs. Alcohol (22% versus 11%, P = 0.04) and hepatitis C virus (51% versus 27%, P = 0.008) were more common as disease etiologies for recipients with ADs versus recipients with UADs. More ADs than UADs considered themselves to be religious (68.9% versus 43.2%, P = 0.007). Ambivalence about RHL donation was present in 33.8% of the candidates who completed the donation process. These results suggest that ambivalence should not be the sole reason for disqualifying a potential donor who otherwise satisfies program requirements.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604356     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Donor selection for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: well begun is half done.

Authors:  Amit Sharma; April Ashworth; Martha Behnke; Adrian Cotterell; Marc Posner; Robert A Fisher
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

4.  Health-related quality of life of living liver donors 1 year after donation.

Authors:  Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang; Wei-Chen Lee; Yu-Hsia Tsai; Woan-Shyuan Wang; Kang-Hua Chen
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Predictors of decision ambivalence and the differences between actual living liver donors and potential living liver donors.

Authors:  Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang; Hsiu-Hsin Tsai; Wei-Chen Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.