Literature DB >> 21602998

How to interpret gastric emptying scintigraphy.

Ju Won Seok1.   

Abstract

Gastric emptying scintigraphy has long been the standard method for measuring gastric motility. Various methodologies for this study have been used including meal composition, patient positioning, instrumentation, frequency of data acquisition, study length and quantitative method. For accurate quantification, it is not important which method is in use, except that the methodology should always be the same and normal values need to be derived and validated for that methodology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric emptying; Methods; Stomach

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602998      PMCID: PMC3093013          DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.2.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


Introduction

Scintigraphic analysis of gastric motility is noninvasive, reproducible, simple to perform, accurate and quantitative. Ever since the introduction of more than 30 years ago, gastric emptying scintigraphy has been significantly refined and optimized over the years. Radionuclide gastric emptying studies are now well established as the standard method to evaluate gastric emptying.

Standard Gastric Emptying Procedure

Various methodologies have been used.1,2 Meal composition, patient positioning, instrumentation, frequency of data acquisition, study length and quantitative methods all vary between institutions. In general, the patient is asked to fast overnight or for at least 4 hours prior to the study. Diabetic patients should be studied in the morning, 20-30 minutes after their normal insulin dosage. A wide variety of drugs can affect gastric emptying and therefore most medication should be discontinued prior to a scintigraphic evaluation. Smoking delays gastric emptying and should be avoided. To accurately quantify solid emptying, the radiotracer must be tightly bound to the solid meal. There is currently no consensus on the optimal test meal to study gastric emptying. Generally, radiolabel egg albumen with Tc-99m sulfur colloid is used in most nuclear medicine laboratories. The eggs are mixed with 37 MBq Tc-99m sulfur colloid by frying or scrambling and the prepared egg product is then administered orally, often with toasted bread as an egg sandwich. Labeling efficiency is approximately 85%. Measuring simultaneous solid and liquid emptying is feasible using a dual isotope study by radiolabeling a liquid phase with In-111 DTPA (Indium-111 diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid). A clear liquid study may be useful in a patient intolerant of solids but able to retain liquids.3,4 To evaluate liquid emptying, water is labeled with 3.7 MBq In-111 DTPA. The test meal should be ingested within 5-10 minutes, after which imaging commences.

Data Acquisition and Analysis

Immediately after the completion of the meal, the patient is positioned in front of the camera. The study can be acquired on standing, sitting and supine. For accurate quantification, it is not important which method is used, except that the methodology should always be the same and normal values need to be derived and validated for that methodology. The stomach lies obliquely within the abdomen and as food moves from the relatively posterior fundus to the relatively anterior antrum, there is an apparent increase in anterior counts due to lesser depth. For accurate quantitation, images in both anterior and posterior projections are obtained with averaging while attenuation correction should be performed routinely. The standard method for attenuation correction is the geometric mean method (square root of the product of anterior and posterior views). Other work suggests that the use of a single left anterior oblique projection also minimizes geometric effects.5 In that projection, the stomach contents move roughly parallel to the head of gamma camera, thus minimizing the effect of attenuation. The left anterior oblique method requires no mathematical correction of attenuation. Data acquisition is performed for 60-120 minutes either as continuous or intermittent imaging (Fig. 1). In cases where there is prolonged retention of material within the stomach, even more delayed images up to 3 hours may be required. Measurement of the half emptying time, or time required by the stomach to empty 50% of the ingested meal, is the simplest way to assess gastric transit. It is routinely and commonly used for clinical evaluation.
Figure 1

Data acquisition was performed for 120 minutes with intermittent imaging. The region of interest (ROI) is drawn around the activity in the entire stomach in anterior and posterior views (or the left anterior oblique view). The ROI should include any visualized activity in the fundic and antral regions of the stomach, with care to adjust the ROI to avoid activity from adjacent small bowel as in right large figure.

Other protocols call for less frequent image acquisition at every 20-30 minutes for 2-3 hours (Fig. 2). In the some study using this acquisition protocol, the normal values were 10%, 65% and 90%, at 1, 2 and 4 hours, respectively.6 Some data suggest that the longer imaging period of 4 hours provides a higher sensitivity for detection of abnormal emptying, compared to 2 hours.7
Figure 2

Image acquisition was performed at every 30 minutes for 2 hours. Remnant activity at 1 and 2 hours were 88.2% and 67.3%, respectively. The half emptying time (T1/2) was 163.3 minutes. Gastric emptying time was markedly delayed compared to normal value.

Conclusion

Gastric emptying scintigraphy is the only satisfactory method of quantitatively measuring the rate of gastric emptying. But this method has not been standardized unfortunately and many variations exist. It is very important to establish normal ranges for the technique employed in each individual laboratory, as the results are highly dependent on the acquisition of parameters and the test meal used.
  7 in total

1.  Consensus report on gastric emptying: what's needed to prevent tarnishing a gold standard?

Authors:  Alan Maurer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Comparison of left anterior oblique, anterior and geometric mean methods for determining gastric emptying times.

Authors:  P V Ford; R L Kennedy; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  The added diagnostic value of liquid gastric emptying compared with solid emptying alone.

Authors:  Harvey A Ziessman; Ankit Chander; John O Clarke; Alison Ramos; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Procedure guideline for adult solid-meal gastric-emptying study 3.0.

Authors:  Kevin J Donohoe; Alan H Maurer; Harvey A Ziessman; Jean-Luc C Urbain; Henry D Royal; J Martin-Comin
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2009-08-19

5.  Experience with a simplified, standardized 4-hour gastric-emptying protocol.

Authors:  Harvey A Ziessman; Dacian V Bonta; Sibyll Goetze; William J Ravich
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Assessment of gastric emptying using a low fat meal: establishment of international control values.

Authors:  G Tougas; E Y Eaker; T L Abell; H Abrahamsson; M Boivin; J Chen; M P Hocking; E M Quigley; K L Koch; A Z Tokayer; V Stanghellini; Y Chen; J D Huizinga; J Rydén; I Bourgeois; R W McCallum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Effect of early emptying on quantitation and interpretation of liquid gastric emptying studies of infants and young children.

Authors:  E Lin; L P Connolly; L Drubach; D Zurakowski; J DiCanzio; K Mitchell; S T Treves
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.057

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Electrical bioimpedance and other techniques for gastric emptying and motility evaluation.

Authors:  María Raquel Huerta-Franco; Miguel Vargas-Luna; Juana Berenice Montes-Frausto; Corina Flores-Hernández; Ismael Morales-Mata
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-02-15

2.  Small-Volume, Fast-Emptying Gastric Pouch Leads to Better Long-Term Weight Loss and Food Tolerance After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Daniel Riccioppo; Marco Aurelio Santo; Manoel Rocha; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel; Marcio Augusto Diniz; Denis Pajecki; Roberto de Cleva; Flavio Kawamoto
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Liraglutide Effects on Upper Gastrointestinal Investigations: Implications Prior to Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Renuca Modi; Peter Rye; Sarah Cawsey; Daniel W Birch; Arya M Sharma
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Association Between Gastric Emptying Time and Incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases in Subjects With Diabetes.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Park; Seon-Young Park; Jin Ook Chung; Dong Hyuk Cho; Chang-Hwan Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Dong Jin Chung; Sung-Kyu Choi; Jong-Sun Rew; Min Young Chung
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.924

5.  Gastric emptying in migraine: a comparison with functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Yeon Hwa Yu; Yunju Jo; Jun Young Jung; Byung Kun Kim; Ju Won Seok
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.924

6.  Clinical features of gastric emptying after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Dae Hoon Kim; Hyo Yung Yun; Young-Jin Song; Dong Hee Ryu; Hye-Suk Han; Joung-Ho Han; Ki Bae Kim; Soon Man Yoon; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Preoperative Assessment of Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Gastric Content.

Authors:  Ayhan Kaydu; Erhan Gokcek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-09

8.  Gastric emptying scintigraphy in postprandial distress syndrome.

Authors:  Muhammad Hafeez; Fida Hussain; Amjad Salamat; Muhammad Bilal Khan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.