Literature DB >> 21602941

EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research.

Douglas G Altman, Iveta Simera, John Hoey, David Moher, Ken Schulz.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21602941      PMCID: PMC3090180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Med


× No keyword cloud information.
Despite the effort of researchers, editors and peer reviewers, the quality of health-research reporting in journal articles is unsatisfactory.1-6 Guidelines that specify a minimum set of items for reporting can improve the accuracy and transparency of publications, thus facilitating easier and more reliable appraisal of quality and relevance. During the past 10 years several internationally respected guidelines for the reporting of health research have been developed.7-10 However, those guidelines are still not widely supported by medical journals11, 12 or adhered to by researchers, and thus their potential impact is lessened. To remedy this situation the UK National Knowledge Service provided funding to start the EQUATOR project (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research). This initiative seeks to improve the reliability of medical publications by promoting transparent and accurate reporting of health research. This movement grew out of the work of CONSORT9 and other groups. EQUATOR is an umbrella for all areas of health-research reporting. The network aims to become a global centre that provides resources and training, and which assists in the development, dissemination, and implementation of robust reporting guidelines. EQUATOR's strategic plan reflects the needs of its major stakeholders: developers of reporting guidelines, researchers, journal editors, peer-reviewers, and research-funding bodies. One of the first activities was to identify existing reporting guidelines to see how they were developed. The development methods of most guidelines were broadly similar, but with wide variation in important details. Development usually took a long time and only half the groups had strategies for dissemination and implementation of their guidelines. The difficulty of securing sufficient funding to develop, assess, and disseminate guidelines was widely acknowledged as a major problem. The initial survey and discussions with the main stakeholders helped us to prioritise future activities. First, we developed an internet-based resource centre, which can be freely accessed on our website.13 At present, it provides a collection of available reporting guidelines. In the future, the website will also host other resources for authors of research articles, editors, peer-reviewers, and developers of guidelines, including a comprehensive digital library for health-research reporting, guidance for the development of robust reporting guidelines, tools to facilitate their use, and educational materials. The availability of good reporting guidelines is not sufficient for the improvement of the quality of reporting. Our second priority will be active promotion of such guidelines and their use, by developing and running training for editors, peer-reviewers, and authors. The courses will concentrate on the important factors of research reporting and the efficient use of reporting guidelines. EQUATOR Network logo Poor reporting reflects a collective failure of those involved. Collaboration with and the support of influential medical journals are vital for the success of this project. Benefits will be equally split between both communities—users will benefit from improved reliability of scientific information and journals will benefit from increased loyalty of their readers attracted by improved accuracy and reliability of reports. The EQUATOR network will regularly monitor how journals implement reporting guidelines. We will annually audit the quality of reporting across the health-research literature and hope to document gradual improvements. Sufficient funding is a necessary requirement for the development and implementation of robust reporting guidelines and widespread promotion of good reporting of research. In view of how much money funding agencies spend on health research, their lack of interest in ensuring that this research is reported accurately is deeply disappointing. Good reporting is not an optional extra; it is an essential component of research. Funding bodies should recognise this and support initiatives such as EQUATOR that aim to improve the current situation. The EQUATOR Network will hold its official launch meeting on June 26, 2008, in London, UK. The meeting will focus on better understanding of problems associated with health-research reporting and use of reporting guidelines, and on finding potential solutions to improve the health-research literature.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

Authors:  D Moher; D J Cook; S Eastwood; I Olkin; D Rennie; D F Stroup
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Nynke Smidt; Anne W S Rutjes; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M Bossuyt; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-07

5.  Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 26-Apr 1       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Endorsement of the STARD Statement by biomedical journals: survey of instructions for authors.

Authors:  Nynke Smidt; John Overbeke; Henrica de Vet; Patrick Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 7.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Steve Halligan; Sally Hopewell; Victoria Cornelius; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-18

8.  Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future.

Authors:  R D Riley; K R Abrams; A J Sutton; P C Lambert; D R Jones; D Heney; S A Burchill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Edward Mills; Yoon K Loke; Ping Wu; Victor M Montori; Daniel Perri; David Moher; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  14 in total

1.  A Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation.

Authors:  Gila Neta; Russell E Glasgow; Christopher R Carpenter; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Borsika A Rabin; Maria E Fernandez; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Requirements for Study Registration and Adherence to Reporting Guidelines in Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Jianqiang Li; Jingao Zhang; Bo Geng; Yao Chen; Xiaobin Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  To sim or not to sim-choosing wisely for procedural skills training in paediatrics.

Authors:  Ali Al Maawali; Harish Amin; Krista Baerg; Mark Feldman; Fabian Gorodzinksy; Allan Puran; Adam Dubrowski; Zia Bismilla
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.600

4.  Preliminary Minimum Reporting Requirements for In-Vivo Neural Interface Research: I. Implantable Neural Interfaces.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Jean Delbeke; Jorge Cardoso; Martijn de Neeling; Sam E John; Chang Won Lee; Jerry Skefos; Argus Sun; Dimiter Prodanov; Zach McKinney
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-22

5.  Open Medicine at five years.

Authors:  Claire Kendall; Anita Palepu; Kapil Khatter; Sally Murray; John Willinsky; Lucy Turner; Anne Marie Todkill
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 6.  Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Kusala Pussegoda; Lucy Turner; Chantelle Garritty; Alain Mayhew; Becky Skidmore; Adrienne Stevens; Isabelle Boutron; Rafael Sarkis-Onofre; Lise M Bjerre; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-19

7.  Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process.

Authors:  Amédé Gogovor; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Ali Ben Charif; Robert K D McLean; David Moher; Andrew Milat; Luke Wolfenden; Karina Prévost; Emmanuelle Aubin; Paula Rochon; Giraud Ekanmian; Jasmine Sawadogo; Nathalie Rheault; France Légaré
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-11

8.  Clinical significance of serum sex hormones in postmenopausal women with vestibular migraine: potential role of estradiol.

Authors:  Bo Tang; Xiaojun Yu; Wei Jiang; Chuang Zhang; Tao Zhan; Yuqin He
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Missing outcomes in randomized trials: addressing the dilemma.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-05-12

10.  Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic.

Authors:  Terence J Quinn; Jennifer K Burton; Ben Carter; Nicola Cooper; Kerry Dwan; Ryan Field; Suzanne C Freeman; Claudia Geue; Ping-Hsuan Hsieh; Kris McGill; Clareece R Nevill; Dikshyanta Rana; Alex Sutton; Martin Taylor Rowan; Yiqiao Xin
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.