Literature DB >> 21602625

Basic life support instructor training: comparison of instructor-led and self-guided training.

Eric L Einspruch1, Jennifer Lembach, Bonnie Lynch, William Lee, Richard Harper, Ross J Fleischman.   

Abstract

In this randomized trial, the authors compared the instructional quality of instructor candidates trained in instructional methods through an Internet-based versus a traditional classroom-led version of the American Heart Association Core Instructor Course. The self-guided, Internet-based group had significantly higher posttest scores than did the traditional instructor-led group (although not when adjusted for pretest scores). The Internet-based group scores changed from 54% to 67%, exceeding the a priori definition of 8% as a minimally practically significant improvement (instructor-led group scores changed from 49% to 53%). The Internet-based course appeared to be a suitable alternative to the traditional course.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602625     DOI: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318217b421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurses Staff Dev        ISSN: 1098-7886


  2 in total

Review 1.  Faculty Development Approaches for Life Support Courses: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Adam Cheng; Kasper G Lauridsen; Taylor L Sawyer; Farhan Bhanji; Robert Greif
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  The effects of an online basic life support course on undergraduate nursing students' learning.

Authors:  Lucia Tobase; Heloisa H C Peres; Renan Gianotto-Oliveira; Nicole Smith; Thatiane F Polastri; Sergio Timerman
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-08-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.