BACKGROUND: Despite benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe but less symptomatic heart failure, approximately 30% of patients do not fully respond to treatment. We hypothesized that a combined assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and contractile function by strain-based imaging would identify patients who would most benefit from CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1077 patients with New York Heart Association class I/II, LV ejection fraction ≤30% and QRS width ≥130 ms enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial with sufficient echocardiographic image quality for cardiac deformation analysis (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD], n=416; CRT, n=661). Patients were assigned to CRT plus an ICD or to ICD alone in 3:2 random assignment. We assessed the degree to which baseline echocardiographic assessments of dyssynchrony, measured as the standard deviation of time-to-peak transverse strain over 12 segments, contractile function, measured as global longitudinal strain, or both predicted the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of death or heart failure. With 213 primary events occurring over a mean of 2.4 years, the benefit of CRT plus an ICD relative to ICD alone was greatest in patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony (time-to-peak transverse strain standard deviation, 142 to 230 ms) and greater baseline contractile function (global longitudinal strain ≤-8.7%). Overall, those patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony and those with best contractile function at baseline demonstrated the greatest benefit from CRT (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.44). Dyssynchrony and global longitudinal strain predicted response to CRT independent of each other, QRS width, LV ejection fraction, and presence versus absence of left bundle-branch block, although the observed benefit remained greatest in patients with left bundle-branch block. CONCLUSIONS: Both mechanical dyssynchrony and contractile function are important independent correlates of benefit from CRT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe but less symptomatic heart failure, approximately 30% of patients do not fully respond to treatment. We hypothesized that a combined assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and contractile function by strain-based imaging would identify patients who would most benefit from CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1077 patients with New York Heart Association class I/II, LV ejection fraction ≤30% and QRS width ≥130 ms enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial with sufficient echocardiographic image quality for cardiac deformation analysis (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD], n=416; CRT, n=661). Patients were assigned to CRT plus an ICD or to ICD alone in 3:2 random assignment. We assessed the degree to which baseline echocardiographic assessments of dyssynchrony, measured as the standard deviation of time-to-peak transverse strain over 12 segments, contractile function, measured as global longitudinal strain, or both predicted the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of death or heart failure. With 213 primary events occurring over a mean of 2.4 years, the benefit of CRT plus an ICD relative to ICD alone was greatest in patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony (time-to-peak transverse strain standard deviation, 142 to 230 ms) and greater baseline contractile function (global longitudinal strain ≤-8.7%). Overall, those patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony and those with best contractile function at baseline demonstrated the greatest benefit from CRT (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.44). Dyssynchrony and global longitudinal strain predicted response to CRT independent of each other, QRS width, LV ejection fraction, and presence versus absence of left bundle-branch block, although the observed benefit remained greatest in patients with left bundle-branch block. CONCLUSIONS: Both mechanical dyssynchrony and contractile function are important independent correlates of benefit from CRT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
Authors: Gianni Pedrizzetti; Alfonso R Martiniello; Valter Bianchi; Antonio D'Onofrio; Pio Caso; Giovanni Tonti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Usama A Daimee; Helmut U Klein; Michael C Giudici; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Arthur J Moss; Valentina Kutyifa Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Hicham Skali; Robert Gerwien; Timothy E Meyer; James V Snider; Scott D Solomon; Craig M Stolen Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Susan Cheng; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stanchev; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Scott D Solomon; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Amil M Shah; Brian Claggett; Nancy K Sweitzer; Sanjiv J Shah; Inder S Anand; Li Liu; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tor Biering-Sørensen; Sanjiv J Shah; Inder Anand; Nancy Sweitzer; Brian Claggett; Li Liu; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon; Amil M Shah Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Yanli Zhou; Tracy L Faber; Zenic Patel; Russell D Folks; Alice A Cheung; Ernest V Garcia; Prem Soman; Dianfu Li; Kejiang Cao; Ji Chen Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Susan Cheng; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stanchev; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Scott D Solomon; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 7.792