Literature DB >> 21602549

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: which parameters and diagnostic strategies are more valuable?

Xin-Xin Shuai1, Yu-Yuan Chen, Yong-Xin Lu, Guan-Hua Su, Yu-Hui Wang, Hong-Liang Zhao, Jun Han.   

Abstract

AIMS: There are no unified criteria for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the present main diagnostic criteria and to discover which parameters and strategies are more valuable. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Echocardiographic data and plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide  levels were assessed in a derivation cohort (n= 236) and a validation cohort (n= 98). Both cohorts included normal controls, patients with hypertensive heart disease without heart failure and patients with HFpEF. In the derivation cohort, the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to tissue Doppler velocity at lateral mitral annulus (lateral E/e'≥12), left atrial volume index (LAVI≥34 mL/m(2)), and the difference between duration of reversed pulmonary vein atrial systole flow and duration of mitral A wave flow (Ard-Ad>30 ms) had the greatest diagnostic value among all the single parameters. A brief strategy that consisted of either: (i) lateral E/e'≥12; or (ii) 12>lateral E/e'≥8, with either LAVI≥34 mL/m(2) or Ard-Ad>30 ms, provided good diagnostic accuracy for identifying diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF, with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 81%. These observations were confirmed in the validation cohort.
CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic parameters including lateral E/e', LAVI, and Ard-Ad have the greatest value in diagnosing HFpEF. A brief strategy that included these three parameters had great diagnostic value and would be simple to use in clinic practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602549     DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  11 in total

1.  Measures of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling and Incident Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Matched Case-Control Analysis.

Authors:  Carolyn L Lekavich; Debra J Barksdale; Jia-Rong Wu; Virginia Neelon; Jamie Crandell; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.712

2.  Comparisons of Left Atrial Functional Parameters with Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in a Large Taiwanese Population with Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Age.

Authors:  Kai-Chieh Hsu; Mei-Chun Chou; Hsiao-Ching Chu; Kuan-Rau Chiou; Feng-You Kuo; Wei-Chun Huang; Wei-Tien Chang; Wen-Yee Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  Molecular and cellular basis for diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Loek van Heerebeek; Constantijn P M Franssen; Nazha Hamdani; Freek W A Verheugt; G Aernout Somsen; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

4.  Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in early severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective, observational echocardiography study.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Joel E Pittman; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Michael J Lanspa; Kathryn G Kuttler; Sheldon E Litwin; Colin K Grissom
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2012-05-04

5.  A novel electrocardiographic index for the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Mehdi Namdar; Patric Biaggi; Barbara Stähli; Bernhard Bütler; Rubén Casado-Arroyo; Danilo Ricciardi; Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Jan Steffel; David Hürlimann; Christian Schmied; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Andrea Sarkozy; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Firat Duru; Walter J Paulus; Pedro Brugada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Interstudy heterogeneity of definitions of diastolic dysfunction severely affects reported prevalence.

Authors:  Jonas Selmeryd; Egil Henriksen; Jerzy Leppert; Pär Hedberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  A prospective evaluation of the established criteria for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using the Alberta HEART cohort.

Authors:  Justin A Ezekowitz; Finlay A McAlister; Jonathan Howlett; Wendimagegn Alemayehu; Ian Paterson; Israel Belenkie; Gavin Y Oudit; Padma Kaul; Jason R Dyck; Todd Anderson
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-07-25

8.  Left atrial stiffness is superior to volume and strain parameters in predicting elevated NT-proBNP levels in systemic sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Adél Porpáczy; Ágnes Nógrádi; Vivien Vértes; Margit Tőkés-Füzesi; László Czirják; András Komócsi; Réka Faludi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Is a Possible Independent Risk Factor of Radiation Pneumonitis in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Guoxin Cai; Shuai Liang; Chuanbao Li; Xue Meng; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Low NT-proBNP levels in overweight and obese patients do not rule out a diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Leo F Buckley; Justin M Canada; Marco G Del Buono; Salvatore Carbone; Cory R Trankle; Hayley Billingsley; Dinesh Kadariya; Ross Arena; Benjamin W Van Tassell; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.