Literature DB >> 21602539

The effectiveness of two active interventions compared to self-care advice in employees with non-acute low back symptoms: a randomised, controlled trial with a 4-year follow-up in the occupational health setting.

J Rantonen1, S Luoto, A Vehtari, M Hupli, J Karppinen, A Malmivaara, S Taimela.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effectiveness of two active interventions, aimed at secondary prevention of low back pain (LBP), in occupational health.
METHODS: We performed a survey of LBP (n=2480; response rate 71%) and randomized 143 employees (66% males, 45 years) with LBP over 34 mm on VAS into Rehabilitation (n=43), Exercise (n=43) or self-care (n=40) groups. Primary outcomes were LBP, physical impairment (PI) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for two years and sickness absence (SA) days during four years (LBP specific, total).
RESULTS: Compared to self-care, exercise reduced LBP at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -12 mm; 95% CI -21 to -2) and improved HRQoL at 12 and 24 months (0.03; 0.00 to 0.05), but did not reduce PI. The MDs of SA days in four years were -17 (-70 to 35, total) and -15 (-47 to 13, LBP specific). Exercise reduced the probability of LBP specific SA during the third and fourth year. Compared to self-care, Rehabilitation reduced LBP at 3 months (-10 mm; -19 to -1) and 6 months (-10 mm; -20 to - 1), but was not effective in HRQoL or PI. The MDs of SA days in four years were -41 (-93 to 8; total) and 5 (-30 to 47; LBP specific). Rehabilitation reduced the probability of total SA during first and second year and amount of total SA days in the fourth year.
CONCLUSIONS: Among employees with relatively mild LBP, both interventions reduced pain, but the effects on SA and PI were minor. Exercise improved HRQoL. The effect sizes were rather small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00908102.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602539     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2009.054312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  9 in total

Review 1.  Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain.

Authors:  Frederieke G Schaafsma; Karyn Whelan; Allard J van der Beek; Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek; Anneli Ojajärvi; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-30

Review 2.  A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain.

Authors:  Joanna L McParland; Pamela Andrews; Lisa Kidd; Lynn Williams; Paul Flowers
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 3.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

4.  The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Authors:  Majid Artus; Danielle van der Windt; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control.

Authors:  J Rantonen; J Karppinen; A Vehtari; S Luoto; E Viikari-Juntura; M Hupli; A Malmivaara; S Taimela
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Treatment Efficacy, Clinical Utility, and Cost-Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Treatments for Persistent Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Markus Melloh; Rebecca Crawford; Stephanie Scherrer; Norbert Boos; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19

Review 7.  Education as a strategy for managing occupational-related musculoskeletal pain: a scoping review.

Authors:  Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson; Shellie Boudreau; Morten Høgh; Pablo Herrero; Pablo Bellosta-Lopez; Victor Domenech-Garcia; Francesco Langella; Nicolo Gagni; Steffan Wittrup Christensen; Morten Villumsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cost-effectiveness of providing patients with information on managing mild low-back symptoms in an occupational health setting.

Authors:  J Rantonen; J Karppinen; A Vehtari; S Luoto; E Viikari-Juntura; M Hupli; A Malmivaara; S Taimela
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gillian Findley; Cormac Ryan; Amy Cartwright; Denis Martin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.