Literature DB >> 21601607

Characterizing non-constant relative potency.

Gregg E Dinse1, David M Umbach.   

Abstract

Relative potency plays an important role in toxicology. Estimates of relative potency are used to rank chemicals by their effects, to calculate equivalent doses of test chemicals compared to a standard, and to weight contributions of constituent chemicals when evaluating mixtures. Typically relative potency is characterized by a constant dilution factor, even when non-similar dose-response curves indicate that constancy is inappropriate. Improperly regarding relative potency as constant may distort conclusions and potentially mislead investigators or policymakers. We consider a more general approach that allows relative potency to vary as a function of dose, response, or response quantile. Distinct functions can be defined, each generalizing different but equivalent descriptions of constant relative potency. When two chemicals have identical response limits, these functions all carry fundamentally equivalent information; otherwise, relative potency as a function of response quantile is distinct and embodies a modified definition of relative potency. Which definition is preferable depends on whether one views any differences in response limits as intrinsic to the chemicals or as extrinsic, arising from idiosyncrasies of data sources. We illustrate these ideas with constructed examples and real data. Relative potency functions offer a unified and principled description of relative potency for non-similar dose-response curves. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21601607      PMCID: PMC3134169          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  14 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of radioligand assay data.

Authors:  D Rodbard; G R Frazier
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Ranking of carcinogenic potency using a relative potency approach.

Authors:  L R Glass; C E Easterly; T D Jones; P J Walsh
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  A versatile method for simultaneous analysis of families of curves.

Authors:  V Guardabasso; P J Munson; D Rodbard
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Statistical quality control and routine data processing for radioimmunoassays and immunoradiometric assays.

Authors:  D Rodbard
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Statistical procedures for bioassays when the condition of similarity does not obtain.

Authors:  C P Cox; P E Leaverton
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  The meaning of bioassay.

Authors:  D J Finney
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A model-free approach to estimation of relative potency in dose-response curve analysis.

Authors:  V Guardabasso; D Rodbard; P J Munson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1987-03

Review 8.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Dose-response relationships for induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity in liver, lung, and skin in female mice following subchronic exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  M J DeVito; M G Ménache; J J Diliberto; D G Ross; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Evaluation of toxic equivalency factors for induction of cytochromes P450 CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity by dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Nigel J Walker; A John Bailer; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  3 in total

1.  Parameterizing dose-response models to estimate relative potency functions directly.

Authors:  Gregg E Dinse; David M Umbach
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Selection for and Analysis of UV-Resistant Cryptophlebia Leucotreta Granulovirus-SA as a Biopesticide for Thaumatotibia leucotreta.

Authors:  Patrick Mwanza; Michael Jukes; Gill Dealtry; Michael Lee; Sean Moore
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.