Literature DB >> 21600771

The low uptake of breast screening in cities is a major public health issue and may be due to organisational factors: a Census-based record linkage study.

H Kinnear1, M Rosato, A Mairs, C Hall, D O'Reilly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening uptake is generally lower in UK cities but quantifying city-level effects from causes due to population composition that comprise cities is hampered by data limitations.
METHODS: A unique data linkage project combining a 2001 Census-based longitudinal study in Northern Ireland with the NHS Breast Screening Program. Validated uptake in the three years following the Census for Belfast Metropolitan Urban Area was compared against the rest of the country with adjustment for cohort attributes defined at Census.
RESULTS: Belfast Metropolitan Urban Area contained 34.8% of invited women but a greater proportion who rented their accommodation (40.3%) or who did not have a car (47.1%). After full adjustment for demographic and socio-economic factors, Belfast Metropolitan Urban Area uptake was lower for first and subsequent screen (Odds ratio (OR) 0.72; 95% CIs 0.66, 0.78 and OR 0.58; 95% CIs 0.55, 0.62 respectively). There were no significant interactions between patient characteristics and area of residence indicating that all residents in Belfast Metropolitan Urban Area are equally affected.
CONCLUSION: The reduced uptake of screening in cities is a major public health issue; the effects are large and a large proportion of the population are affected, organisational factors appear to be the primary cause. Strategies to correct this imbalance might help reduce inequalities in health.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21600771     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  5 in total

1.  Uptake of breast screening is influenced by current religion and religion of upbringing.

Authors:  Dermot O'Reilly; Heather Kinnear; Michael Rosato; Adrian Mairs; Clare Hall
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-12

2.  Risk of several cancers is higher in urban areas after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Results from a two-country population-based study of 18 common cancers.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; David Donnelly; Avril Hegarty; Anne-Elie Carsin; Sandra Deady; Neil McCluskey; Anna Gavin; Harry Comber
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Demographic factors influencing consensus opinion on the recall for women screened by mobile mammography unit in taiwan.

Authors:  Lee Yu-Mei; Yao Hsueh-Hua
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 0.212

4.  Intermittent attendance at breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Padraic Fleming; Sinead O'Neill; Miriam Owens; Therese Mooney; Patricia Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2013-09-05

5.  Lifetime utilization of mammography among Maltese women: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Danika Marmarà; Vincent Marmarà; Gill Hubbard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.