OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of mid-follicular recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) supplementation in down-regulated women of advanced reproductive age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized parallel-group study (allocation 1:1) including 187 normogonadotrophic infertile patients aged ≥ 35 years. Subcutaneous triptorelin was used for pituitary desensitization, and ovarian stimulation was achieved with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) either alone (Group 1) or in combination with rhLH in one of two daily doses: 37.5 IU (Group 2) or 75 IU (Group 3). Ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF outcome were evaluated. The main outcome was pregnancy rate. RESULTS:A total of 62, 62 and 63 patients were randomized to groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively, and 56, 54 and 55 patients respectively were available for final analysis of the results. Follicular development and oocyte yield were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared with patients in groups 2 and 3. Oocyte maturity and number of oocytes fertilized were also higher in group 1 patients; this difference almost reached statistical significance. No significant difference in implantation and clinical pregnancy rates was found among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS:rhLH supplementation is not a useful tool for patients of advanced reproductive age in ovarian stimulation protocols using an appropriate gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and a step-down regimen of rhFSH.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of mid-follicular recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) supplementation in down-regulated women of advanced reproductive age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized parallel-group study (allocation 1:1) including 187 normogonadotrophic infertilepatients aged ≥ 35 years. Subcutaneous triptorelin was used for pituitary desensitization, and ovarian stimulation was achieved with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) either alone (Group 1) or in combination with rhLH in one of two daily doses: 37.5 IU (Group 2) or 75 IU (Group 3). Ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF outcome were evaluated. The main outcome was pregnancy rate. RESULTS: A total of 62, 62 and 63 patients were randomized to groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively, and 56, 54 and 55 patients respectively were available for final analysis of the results. Follicular development and oocyte yield were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared with patients in groups 2 and 3. Oocyte maturity and number of oocytes fertilized were also higher in group 1 patients; this difference almost reached statistical significance. No significant difference in implantation and clinical pregnancy rates was found among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: rhLH supplementation is not a useful tool for patients of advanced reproductive age in ovarian stimulation protocols using an appropriate gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and a step-down regimen of rhFSH.