Literature DB >> 21600363

Patient-reported outcomes in supportive care.

Emma Bateman1, Dorothy Keefe.   

Abstract

Traditionally, anticancer therapy has focused on eradication of neoplastic tissue, predominantly by invasive and/or toxic treatments. In modern studies, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become more common, and give a true picture of toxicity. Increased consideration of subjective patient perspectives of anticancer treatments has allowed a notable shift within supportive oncology. Disparity exists between physician and patient perspectives of symptom severity, despite several common scoring methods. PROs are vital tools in the overall assessment of chronic illnesses, including cancer and associated treatments. Synergistic assessments of objective and subjective observations of symptoms and function are most accurate. PROs include information collected either in a clinic or by a diary system. Patient self-reporting, like any other assessment of health status, is not an absolute measure. Electronic data collection is an increasingly useful way to monitor PROs. Factors that influence quality of life (QOL) are predominantly subjective experiences, and can occur concurrently with pre-existing symptoms, which increases symptom burden. There are several validated systems for assessing PROs; some are concerned with specific conditions like mucositis (Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire [OMDQ]), whereas others cover chronic illness in general (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS]). The PROMIS framework was developed by the National Health Institute (NHI) to standardize self-reported health measurements within chronic illnesses, including pain, fatigue and emotional distress. The general Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) scale was developed to assess many different types of cancer; we will discuss use in oral mucositis as a model. There is more to measuring toxicity than the clinician's objective view of the patient experience. There is still much to be done to validate all the necessary PRO tools so that we can competently measure both toxicity and toxicity-reduction strategies. Current systems to assess PROs continue to have a very positive impact on supportive oncology.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21600363     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  6 in total

1.  Oral mucositis in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing chemotherapy: the impact of symptoms on quality of life.

Authors:  Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Vincent Lee; Chak Ho Li; Hui Leung Yuen; Joel B Epstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Quality of life research in neuro-oncology: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Elizabeth Klein; David Altshuler; Abhirami Hallock; Nicholas Szerlip
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Late effects in survivors of central nervous system tumors: reports by patients and proxies.

Authors:  Kelly Sloane; Carolyn Vachani; Margaret K Hampshire; James M Metz; Christine E Hill-Kayser
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Prevalence of pain and analgesic use in men with metastatic prostate cancer using a patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Karen A Autio; Antonia V Bennett; Xiaoyu Jia; Michael Fruscione; Tomasz M Beer; Daniel J George; Michael A Carducci; Christopher J Logothetis; Robert C Kane; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Digestive or Lung Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Audrey Murat-Ringot; Pierre Jean Souquet; Fabien Subtil; Florent Boutitie; Marie Preau; Vincent Piriou
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a mucoadhesive hydrogel (MuGard) in mitigating oral mucositis symptoms in patients being treated with chemoradiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck.

Authors:  Ron R Allison; Aaron A Ambrad; Youssef Arshoun; Richard J Carmel; Doug F Ciuba; Elizabeth Feldman; Steven E Finkelstein; Ranjini Gandhavadi; Dwight E Heron; Steven C Lane; John M Longo; Charles Meakin; Dimitrios Papadopoulos; David E Pruitt; Lynn M Steinbrenner; Michael A Taylor; William M Wisbeck; Grace E Yuh; David P Nowotnik; Stephen T Sonis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.