Literature DB >> 21599663

Testing effects of consumer richness, evenness and body size on ecosystem functioning.

Julia Reiss1, R A Bailey, Daniel M Perkins, Angela Pluchinotta, Guy Woodward.   

Abstract

1. Numerous studies have revealed (usually positive) relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (B-EF), but the underpinning drivers are rarely addressed explicitly, hindering the development of a more predictive understanding. 2. We developed a suite of statistical models (where we combined existing models with novel ones) to test for richness and evenness effects on detrital processing in freshwater microcosms. Instead of using consumer species as biodiversity units, we used two size classes within three species (six types). This allowed us to test for diversity effects and also to focus on the role of body size and biomass. 3. Our statistical models tested for (i) whether performance in polyculture was more than the sum of its parts (non-additive effects), (ii) the effects of specific type combinations (assemblage identity effects) and (iii) whether types behaved differently when their absolute or relative abundances were altered (e.g. because type abundance in polyculture was lower compared with monoculture). The latter point meant we did not need additional density treatments. 4. Process rates were independent of richness and evenness and all types performed in an additive fashion. The performance of a type was mainly driven by the consumers' metabolic requirements (connected to body size). On an assemblage level, biomass explained a large proportion of detrital processing rates. 5. We conclude that B-EF studies would benefit from widening their statistical approaches. Further, they need to consider biomass of species assemblages and whether biomass is comprised of small or large individuals, because even if all species are present in the same biomass, small species (or individuals) will perform better.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21599663     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01857.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  11 in total

1.  Woody plant phylogenetic diversity mediates bottom-up control of arthropod biomass in species-rich forests.

Authors:  Andreas Schuldt; Martin Baruffol; Helge Bruelheide; Simon Chen; Xiulian Chi; Marcus Wall; Thorsten Assmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Species identity drives ecosystem function in a subsidy-dependent coastal ecosystem.

Authors:  Kyle A Emery; Jenifer E Dugan; R A Bailey; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Studying biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships in experimental microcosms among islands.

Authors:  Anette Teittinen; Janne Soininen; Leena Virta
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.431

4.  Higher biodiversity is required to sustain multiple ecosystem processes across temperature regimes.

Authors:  Daniel M Perkins; R A Bailey; Matteo Dossena; Lars Gamfeldt; Julia Reiss; Mark Trimmer; Guy Woodward
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Habitat Complexity in Aquatic Microcosms Affects Processes Driven by Detritivores.

Authors:  Lorea Flores; R A Bailey; Arturo Elosegi; Aitor Larrañaga; Julia Reiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Body size variation in aquatic consumers causes pervasive community effects, independent of mean body size.

Authors:  Bradley E Carlson; Tracy Langkilde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Compensatory responses can alter the form of the biodiversity-function relation curve.

Authors:  Matthias S Thomsen; Jasmin A Godbold; Clement Garcia; Stefan G Bolam; Ruth Parker; Martin Solan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Size matters: implications of the loss of large individuals for ecosystem function.

Authors:  Alf Norkko; Anna Villnäs; Joanna Norkko; Sebastian Valanko; Conrad Pilditch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biotic vs. abiotic control of decomposition: a comparison of the effects of simulated extinctions and changes in temperature.

Authors:  Luz Boyero; Bradley J Cardinale; Mikis Bastian; Richard G Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nonadditive effects of consumption in an intertidal macroinvertebrate community are independent of food availability but driven by complementarity effects.

Authors:  Emily M van Egmond; Peter M van Bodegom; Jurgen R van Hal; Richard S P van Logtestijn; Matty P Berg; Rien Aerts
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.