Literature DB >> 21599540

Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors.

Natalja E Fedorovich1, Elske Kuipers, Debby Gawlitta, Wouter J A Dhert, Jacqueline Alblas.   

Abstract

Insufficient supply of oxygen and nutrients throughout the graft is considered one of the principal limitations in development of large, tissue-engineered bone grafts. Organ or tissue printing by means of three-dimensional (3D) fiber deposition is a novel modality in regenerative medicine that combines pore formation and defined cell placement, and is used here for development of cell-laden hydrogel structures with reproducible internal architecture to sustain oxygen supply and to support adequate tissue development. In this study we tested the effect of porosity on multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) embedded in hydrogel constructs printed with a 3D fiber deposition (3DF) machine. For this, porous and solid alginate hydrogel scaffolds, with MSCs homogeneously dispersed throughout the construct, were printed and analyzed in vitro for the presence of hypoxia markers, metabolism, survival, and osteogenic differentiation. We demonstrated that porosity promotes oxygenation of MSCs in printed hydrogel scaffolds and supported the viability and osteogenic differentiation of embedded cells. Porous and solid printed constructs were subsequently implanted subcutaneously in immunodeficient mice to analyze tissue formation in relation to hypoxia responses of embedded cells. Implantation of printed grafts resulted in ingrowth of vascularized tissue and significantly enhanced oxygenation of embedded MSCs. In conclusion, the introduction of pores significantly enhances the conductive properties of printed hydrogel constructs and contributes to the functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21599540     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  16 in total

1.  3D-Printed Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications.

Authors:  Aidan J Cloonan; Danial Shahmirzadi; Ronny X Li; Barry J Doyle; Elisa E Konofagou; Tim M McGloughlin
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Hydrogels That Allow and Facilitate Bone Repair, Remodeling, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Aaron R Short; Deepthi Koralla; Ameya Deshmukh; Benjamin Wissel; Benjamin Stocker; Mark Calhoun; David Dean; Jessica O Winter
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.331

3.  Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture.

Authors:  Hang Lin; Dongning Zhang; Peter G Alexander; Guang Yang; Jian Tan; Anthony Wai-Ming Cheng; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Integrating three-dimensional printing and nanotechnology for musculoskeletal regeneration.

Authors:  Margaret Nowicki; Nathan J Castro; Raj Rao; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.874

5.  Development and Assessment of a 3D-Printed Scaffold with rhBMP-2 for an Implant Surgical Guide Stent and Bone Graft Material: A Pilot Animal Study.

Authors:  Ji Cheol Bae; Jin-Ju Lee; Jin-Hyung Shim; Keun-Ho Park; Jeong-Seok Lee; Eun-Bin Bae; Jae-Won Choi; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity.

Authors:  Michelle T Poldervaart; Birgit Goversen; Mylene de Ruijter; Anna Abbadessa; Ferry P W Melchels; F Cumhur Öner; Wouter J A Dhert; Tina Vermonden; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The cell in the ink: Improving biofabrication by printing stem cells for skeletal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  G Cidonio; M Glinka; J I Dawson; R O C Oreffo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  3D Bioprinting of Cartilage for Orthopedic Surgeons: Reading between the Lines.

Authors:  Claudia Di Bella; Amanda Fosang; Davide M Donati; Gordon G Wallace; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-08-13

9.  Sustained release of BMP-2 in bioprinted alginate for osteogenicity in mice and rats.

Authors:  Michelle T Poldervaart; Huanan Wang; Johan van der Stok; Harrie Weinans; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; F Cumhur Öner; Wouter J A Dhert; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Producing 3D Biomimetic Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal System Regeneration.

Authors:  Ignasi Casanellas; Andrea García-Lizarribar; Anna Lagunas; Josep Samitier
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.