Literature DB >> 21599433

Sequential alternating deferiprone and deferoxamine treatment compared to deferiprone monotherapy: main findings and clinical follow-up of a large multicenter randomized clinical trial in -thalassemia major patients.

Gaetano Restivo Pantalone1, Aurelio Maggio, Angela Vitrano, Marcello Capra, Liana Cuccia, Francesco Gagliardotto, Aldo Filosa, Maria Antonietta Romeo, Carmelo Magnano, Vincenzo Caruso, Crocetta Argento, Calogera Gerardi, Saveria Campisi, Pietro Violi, Roberto Malizia, Paolo Cianciulli, Michele Rizzo, Domenico Giuseppe D'Ascola, Alessandra Quota, Luciano Prossomariti, Carmelo Fidone, Paolo Rigano, Alessia Pepe, Gennaro D'Amico, Alberto Morabito, Christian Gluud.   

Abstract

In β-thalassemia major (β-TM) patients, iron chelation therapy is mandatory to reduce iron overload secondary to transfusions. Recommended first line treatment is deferoxamine (DFO) from the age of 2 and second line treatment after the age of 6 is deferiprone (L1). A multicenter randomized open-label trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of long-term alternating sequential L1-DFO vs. L1 alone iron chelation therapy in β-TM patients. Deferiprone 75 mg/kg 4 days/week and DFO 50 mg/kg/day for 3 days/week was compared with L1 alone 75 mg/kg 7 days/week during a 5-year follow-up. A total of 213 thalassemia patients were randomized and underwent intention-to-treat analysis. Statistically, a decrease of serum ferritin level was significantly higher in alternating sequential L1-DFO patients compared with L1 alone patients (p = 0.005). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the two chelation treatments did not show statistically significant differences (log-rank test, p = 0.3145). Adverse events and costs were comparable between the groups. Alternating sequential L1-DFO treatment decreased serum ferritin concentration during a 5-year treatment by comparison to L1 alone, without significant differences of survival, adverse events or costs. These findings were confirmed in a further 21-month follow-up. These data suggest that alternating sequential L1-DFO treatment may be useful for some β-TM patients who may not be able to receive other forms of chelation treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21599433     DOI: 10.3109/03630269.2011.570674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemoglobin        ISSN: 0363-0269            Impact factor:   0.849


  6 in total

Review 1.  An update on iron chelation therapy.

Authors:  Erika Poggiali; Elena Cassinerio; Laura Zanaboni; Maria Domenica Cappellini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  TLc-A, the leading nanochelating-based nanochelator, reduces iron overload in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Somayeh Kalanaky; Maryam Hafizi; Sepideh Safari; Kazem Mousavizadeh; Mahboubeh Kabiri; Alireza Farsinejad; Saideh Fakharzadeh; Mohammad Hassan Nazaran
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia.

Authors:  Patricia M Fortin; Sheila A Fisher; Karen V Madgwick; Marialena Trivella; Sally Hopewell; Carolyn Doree; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox.

Authors:  Nancy F Olivieri; Amir Sabouhanian; Brenda L Gallie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Iron overload disorders.

Authors:  Christine C Hsu; Nizar H Senussi; Kleber Y Fertrin; Kris V Kowdley
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Comparative efficacy and safety of deferoxamine, deferiprone and deferasirox on severe thalassemia: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sujian Xia; Weidong Zhang; Liting Huang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.