Literature DB >> 21599360

New Measurement of the π0 radiative decay width.

I Larin1, D McNulty, E Clinton, P Ambrozewicz, D Lawrence, I Nakagawa, Y Prok, A Teymurazyan, A Ahmidouch, A Asratyan, K Baker, L Benton, A M Bernstein, V Burkert, P Cole, P Collins, D Dale, S Danagoulian, G Davidenko, R Demirchyan, A Deur, A Dolgolenko, G Dzyubenko, R Ent, A Evdokimov, J Feng, M Gabrielyan, L Gan, A Gasparian, S Gevorkyan, A Glamazdin, V Goryachev, V Gyurjyan, K Hardy, J He, M Ito, L Jiang, D Kashy, M Khandaker, P Kingsberry, A Kolarkar, M Konchatnyi, A Korchin, W Korsch, S Kowalski, M Kubantsev, V Kubarovsky, X Li, P Martel, V Matveev, B Mecking, B Milbrath, R Minehart, R Miskimen, V Mochalov, S Mtingwa, S Overby, E Pasyuk, M Payen, R Pedroni, B Ritchie, T E Rodrigues, C Salgado, A Shahinyan, A Sitnikov, D Sober, S Stepanyan, W Stephens, J Underwood, A Vasiliev, V Vishnyakov, M Wood, S Zhou.   

Abstract

High precision measurements of the differential cross sections for π0 photoproduction at forward angles for two nuclei, 12C and 208Pb, have been performed for incident photon energies of 4.9-5.5 GeV to extract the π0→γγ decay width. The experiment was done at Jefferson Lab using the Hall B photon tagger and a high-resolution multichannel calorimeter. The π0→γγ decay width was extracted by fitting the measured cross sections using recently updated theoretical models for the process. The resulting value for the decay width is Γ(π0→γγ)=7.82±0.14(stat)±0.17(syst)  eV. With the 2.8% total uncertainty, this result is a factor of 2.5 more precise than the current Particle Data Group average of this fundamental quantity, and it is consistent with current theoretical predictions.

Year:  2011        PMID: 21599360     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.162303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  3 in total

Review 1.  QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  N Brambilla; S Eidelman; P Foka; S Gardner; A S Kronfeld; M G Alford; R Alkofer; M Butenschoen; T D Cohen; J Erdmenger; L Fabbietti; M Faber; J L Goity; B Ketzer; H W Lin; F J Llanes-Estrada; H B Meyer; P Pakhlov; E Pallante; M I Polikarpov; H Sazdjian; A Schmitt; W M Snow; A Vairo; R Vogt; A Vuorinen; H Wittig; P Arnold; P Christakoglou; P Di Nezza; Z Fodor; X Garcia I Tormo; R Höllwieser; M A Janik; A Kalweit; D Keane; E Kiritsis; A Mischke; R Mizuk; G Odyniec; K Papadodimas; A Pich; R Pittau; J-W Qiu; G Ricciardi; C A Salgado; K Schwenzer; N G Stefanis; G M von Hippel; V I Zakharov
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.590

2.  Dispersive analysis of the pion transition form factor.

Authors:  M Hoferichter; B Kubis; S Leupold; F Niecknig; S P Schneider
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.590

Review 3.  The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: status of lattice QCD calculations.

Authors:  Antoine Gérardin
Journal:  Eur Phys J A Hadron Nucl       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.