Literature DB >> 21598351

A randomized two-by-two comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: the tirofiban evaluation of novel dosing versus abciximab with clopidogrel and inhibition of thrombin (TENACITY) study trial.

David J Moliterno1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the absence of high-dose thienopyridines, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in ischemic events with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One head-to-head trial comparing abciximab and tirofiban among PCI patients found tirofiban to be inferior, and laboratory evidence confirmed that the bolus dose of tirofiban tested in that trial to be less effective than abciximab. Whether a higher bolus dose of tirofiban would be as efficacious as abciximab during PCI is uncertain. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI were randomized equally to abciximab or to tirofiban, given as high-dose bolus (25 μg/kg) plus 12-hr infusion (0.15 μg/kg/min). All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel and were additionally randomized to unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin. Approximately 8,000 patients were to be studied, but after 383 were enrolled, the study sponsor discontinued the trial for financial reasons. The primary endpoint of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab and 6.9% of those randomized to tirofiban. The respective rates of major bleeding were 1.5 and 1.6%. Additionally, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to unfractionated heparin and 7.6% of those randomized to bivalirudin. The respective rates of major bleeding were 2.5% and 0.5%.
CONCLUSION: With limited assessment, this direct comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab produced encouraging results and suggests that further study of this tirofiban dose regimen is warranted. The limited assessments comparing heparin and bivalirudin are consistent with prior observations.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598351     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  11 in total

Review 1.  Optimal use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  H Benjamin Starnes; Ankit A Patel; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?

Authors:  Peter B Berger; Judson B Williams; Vic Hasselblad; Karen Chiswell; Karen S Pieper; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials of Bivalirudin versus Heparin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Methodology.

Authors:  Behnood Bikdeli; Thomas McAndrew; Aaron Crowley; Shmuel Chen; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Björn Redfors; Yangbo Liu; Zixuan Zhang; Mengdan Liu; Yiran Zhang; Dominic P Francese; David Erlinge; Stefan K James; Yaling Han; Yi Li; Adnan Kastrati; Stefanie Schüpke; Rod H Stables; Adeel Shahzad; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Patrick Goldstein; Enrico Frigoli; Roxana Mehran; Marco Valgimigli; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Bivalirudin versus heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials stratified by adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa strategy.

Authors:  Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan; Dixitha Anugula; Nagarjuna R Gujjula; Yogesh N V Reddy; Janani Baskaran; Manu Kaushik; Venkata M Alla; Ganesh Raveendran
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Effect of Early Treatment With Tirofiban on Initial TIMI Grade 3 Flow of Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Mojtaba Salarifar; Mehdi Mousavi; Narges Yousefpour; Ebrahim Nematipour; Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Hamidreza Poorhosseini; Alimohammad Hajizeinali; Mohammad Alidoosti; Hassan Aghajani; Younes Nozari; Alireza Amirzadegan; Ali Bozorgi; Yaser Genab
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Manoj P Jadhav; Tianyao Huo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Anti-Coagulation Conundrum: Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in a Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II.

Authors:  Theodore J Cios; Yuliana Salamanca-Padilla; Dmitri Guvakov
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-23

8.  Safety of tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in treating intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Edgar A Samaniego; Emilee Gibson; Daichi Nakagawa; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Mario Zanaty; Jorge A Roa; Pascal Jabbour; David M Hasan
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2019-02-03

9.  Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin: a meta-analysis of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Mohamed Farag; Diana A Gorog; Abhiram Prasad; Manivannan Srinivasan
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 10.  Bivalirudin Anticoagulant Therapy With or Without Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Transcatheter Coronary Interventional Procedures: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiabei Li; Shiyong Yu; Dehui Qian; Yun He; Jun Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.