Literature DB >> 2159789

Effect of changing the detergent bound to bovine cytochrome c oxidase upon its individual electron-transfer steps.

S N Mahapatro1, N C Robinson.   

Abstract

The influence of the detergent environment upon individual electron-transfer rates of cytochrome c oxidase was investigated by stopped-flow spectrophotometry. The effects of three detergents were studied: lauryl maltoside, which supports a high turnover number (TN = 350 s-1), n-dodecyl octaethylene glycol monoether (C12E8), which supports an intermediate TN (150 s-1), and Triton X-100 in which oxidase is nearly inactive (TN = 2-3 s-1). Under limited turnover conditions (cytochrome c:cytochrome c oxidase ratio = 1:1 to 8:1), the rate of oxidation of cytochrome c was measured and compared with the fast reduction of cytochrome a and its relatively slow reoxidation. Two reducing equivalents of cytochrome c were rapidly oxidized in a burst phase; the remaining two to six equivalents were oxidized more slowly, concurrent with the reoxidation of cytochrome a; i.e., the percent reduced cytochrome a reflects the percent reduced cytochrome c. With the resting enzyme, the bimolecular reaction between reduced cytochrome c and cytochrome a was rapid, was insensitive to the detergent environment, and was not the rate-limiting step in the presence of any detergent. The rate of internal electron transfer from cytochrome a to cytochrome a3 in the resting enzyme was slow and only slightly affected by the detergent environment: 1.0-1.1 s-1 in Triton X-100, 5-7 s-1 in C12E8, and 5-12 s-1 in lauryl maltoside. With the pulsed enzyme, the intramolecular electron transfer between cytochrome a and cytochrome a3 increased 4-5-fold in the lauryl maltoside enzyme but did not increase in the Triton X-100 enzyme (intermediate values were obtained with the C12E8 enzyme). We conclude that cytochrome c oxidase acquires the pulsed conformation only in those detergents that support high TN's, e.g., lauryl maltoside and C12E8, but it is locked in the resting conformation in those detergents which result in low TN's, e.g., Triton X-100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2159789     DOI: 10.1021/bi00455a025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Differential stability of dimeric and monomeric cytochrome c oxidase exposed to elevated hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Jana Stanicová; Erik Sedlák; Andrej Musatov; Neal C Robinson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Photolabeling of cardiolipin binding subunits within bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Erik Sedlák; Markandeswar Panda; Marsha P Dale; Susan T Weintraub; Neal C Robinson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Functional binding of cardiolipin to cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  N C Robinson
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  Sequential dissociation of subunits from bovine heart cytochrome C oxidase by urea.

Authors:  Erik Sedlák; Neal C Robinson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Tryptophan 334 oxidation in bovine cytochrome c oxidase subunit I involves free radical migration.

Authors:  Patrizia Lemma-Gray; Susan T Weintraub; Christopher A Carroll; Andrej Musatov; Neal C Robinson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  The kinetic stability of cytochrome C oxidase: effect of bound phospholipid and dimerization.

Authors:  Erik Sedlák; Rastislav Varhač; Andrej Musatov; Neal C Robinson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Functional and structural evaluation of bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase incorporated into bicelles.

Authors:  Andrey Musatov; Katarina Siposova; Martina Kubovcikova; Veronika Lysakova; Rastislav Varhac
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.079

8.  A conserved amphipathic ligand binding region influences k-path-dependent activity of cytochrome C oxidase.

Authors:  Carrie Hiser; Leann Buhrow; Jian Liu; Leslie Kuhn; Shelagh Ferguson-Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.162

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.