OBJECTIVES: Folate metabolism is an important target for drug therapy. Drug-induced inhibition of folate metabolism often causes an elevation of plasma total homocysteine (tHcy). Plasma tHcy levels are influenced by several nongenetic (e.g. folate intake, age, smoking) as well as genetic factors. Over the last decade, several countries have implemented a nationwide folate fortification program of all grain products. This investigation sought to determine the impact of folate fortification on the relative contribution of environmental and genetic factors to the variability of plasma tHcy. METHODS: Two cohorts were compared in this study, one from the United States (with folate fortification, n=281) and one from Austria (without folate fortification, n=139). Several environmental factors as well as previously identified gene variants important for tHcy levels (MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, MTRR A66G) were examined for their ability to predict plasma tHcy in a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: Nongenetic, environmental factors had a comparable influence on plasma tHcy between the two cohorts (R: approximately 0.19). However, after adjusting for other covariates, the tested gene variants had a substantially smaller impact among patients from the folate-fortified cohort (R=0.021) compared with the nonfolate-fortified cohort (R=0.095). The MTHFR C677T polymorphism was the single most important genetic factor. Male sex, smoking, and folate levels were important predictors for nonfolate-fortified patients; age was for folate-fortified patients. CONCLUSION: Population wide folate fortification had a significant effect on the variability of plasma tHcy and reduced the influence of genetic factors, most importantly the MTHFR 677TT genotype, and may be an important confounder for a personalized drug therapy.
OBJECTIVES:Folate metabolism is an important target for drug therapy. Drug-induced inhibition of folate metabolism often causes an elevation of plasma total homocysteine (tHcy). Plasma tHcy levels are influenced by several nongenetic (e.g. folate intake, age, smoking) as well as genetic factors. Over the last decade, several countries have implemented a nationwide folate fortification program of all grain products. This investigation sought to determine the impact of folate fortification on the relative contribution of environmental and genetic factors to the variability of plasma tHcy. METHODS: Two cohorts were compared in this study, one from the United States (with folate fortification, n=281) and one from Austria (without folate fortification, n=139). Several environmental factors as well as previously identified gene variants important for tHcy levels (MTHFRC677T, MTHFR A1298C, MTRRA66G) were examined for their ability to predict plasma tHcy in a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: Nongenetic, environmental factors had a comparable influence on plasma tHcy between the two cohorts (R: approximately 0.19). However, after adjusting for other covariates, the tested gene variants had a substantially smaller impact among patients from the folate-fortified cohort (R=0.021) compared with the nonfolate-fortified cohort (R=0.095). The MTHFRC677T polymorphism was the single most important genetic factor. Male sex, smoking, and folate levels were important predictors for nonfolate-fortified patients; age was for folate-fortified patients. CONCLUSION: Population wide folate fortification had a significant effect on the variability of plasma tHcy and reduced the influence of genetic factors, most importantly the MTHFR 677TT genotype, and may be an important confounder for a personalized drug therapy.
Authors: Ase Fredriksen; Klaus Meyer; Per Magne Ueland; Stein Emil Vollset; Tom Grotmol; Jørn Schneede Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; John D Osterloh; Jocelyn Kennedy-Stephenson; Mary Frances Picciano; Elizabeth A Yetley; Jeanne I Rader; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Peter Nagele; Frank Brown; Amber Francis; Mitchell G Scott; Brian F Gage; J Philip Miller Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Andreas Duma; Christopher Cartmill; Jane Blood; Anshuman Sharma; Evan D Kharasch; Peter Nagele Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Mmadili N Ilozumba; Yesilda Balavarca; Marian L Neuhouser; Joshua W Miller; Shirley A A Beresford; Yingye Zheng; Xiaoling Song; David J Duggan; Adetunji T Toriola; Lynn B Bailey; Ralph Green; Marie A Caudill; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: J Nutr Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: I O Oliveira; L P Silva; M C Borges; O M Cruz; J W Tessmann; J V S Motta; F K Seixas; B L Horta; D P Gigante Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: J M Biselli; B L Zampieri; E M Goloni-Bertollo; R Haddad; M F R Fonseca; M N Eberlin; H Vannucchi; V M Carvalho; E C Pavarino Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 2.316