Literature DB >> 21597252

Predicting predation through prey ontogeny using size-dependent functional response models.

Michael W McCoy1, Benjamin M Bolker, Karen M Warkentin, James R Vonesh.   

Abstract

The functional response is a critical link between consumer and resource dynamics, describing how a consumer's feeding rate varies with prey density. Functional response models often assume homogenous prey size and size-independent feeding rates. However, variation in prey size due to ontogeny and competition is ubiquitous, and predation rates are often size dependent. Thus, functional responses that ignore prey size may not effectively predict predation rates through ontogeny or in heterogeneous populations. Here, we use short-term response-surface experiments and statistical modeling to develop and test prey size-dependent functional responses for water bugs and dragonfly larvae feeding on red-eyed treefrog tadpoles. We then extend these models through simulations to predict mortality through time for growing prey. Both conventional and size-dependent functional response models predicted average overall mortality in short-term mixed-cohort experiments, but only the size-dependent models accurately captured how mortality was spread across sizes. As a result, simulations that extrapolated these results through prey ontogeny showed that differences in size-specific mortality are compounded as prey grow, causing predictions from conventional and size-dependent functional response models to diverge dramatically through time. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating prey size when modeling consumer-prey dynamics in size-structured, growing prey populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21597252     DOI: 10.1086/659950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  16 in total

1.  Beyond body mass: how prey traits improve predictions of functional response parameters.

Authors:  Ryan M Kalinoski; John P DeLong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Curry J Cunningham; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Consequences of induced hatching plasticity depend on predator community.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wojdak; Justin C Touchon; Jessica L Hite; Beth Meyer; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Trophic cascades alter eco-evolutionary dynamics and body size evolution.

Authors:  Thomas M Luhring; John P DeLong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  System productivity alters predator sorting of a size-structured mixed prey community.

Authors:  Andrew T Davidson; Nathan J Dorn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Behavioral plasticity mitigates risk across environments and predators during anuran metamorphosis.

Authors:  Justin C Touchon; Randall R Jiménez; Shane H Abinette; James R Vonesh; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of size and size structure on predation and inter-cohort competition in red-eyed treefrog tadpoles.

Authors:  Christopher M Asquith; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Influence of intra- and interspecific variation in predator-prey body size ratios on trophic interaction strengths.

Authors:  Ross N Cuthbert; Ryan J Wasserman; Tatenda Dalu; Horst Kaiser; Olaf L F Weyl; Jaimie T A Dick; Arnaud Sentis; Michael W McCoy; Mhairi E Alexander
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Prey responses to predator chemical cues: disentangling the importance of the number and biomass of prey consumed.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy; Justin C Touchon; Tobias Landberg; Karen M Warkentin; James R Vonesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.