Literature DB >> 21596959

The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain.

Britt Stuge1, Andrew Garratt, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen, Margreth Grotle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No appropriate measures have been specifically developed for pelvic girdle pain (PGP). There is a need for suitable outcome measures that are reliable and valid for people with PGP for use in research and clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a condition-specific measure, the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), for use during pregnancy and postpartum.
DESIGN: This was a methodology study.
METHODS: Items were developed from a literature review and information from a focus group of people who consulted physical therapists for PGP. Face validity and content validity were assessed by classifying the items according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. After a pilot study, the PGQ was administered to participants with clinically verified PGP by means of a postal questionnaire in 2 surveys. The first survey included 94 participants (52 pregnant), and the second survey included 87 participants (43 pregnant). Rasch analysis was used for item reduction, and the PGQ was assessed for unidimensionality, item fit, redundancy, and differential item functioning. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a random sample of 42 participants.
RESULTS: The analysis resulted in a questionnaire consisting of 20 activity items and 5 symptom items on a 4-point response scale. The items in both subscales showed a good fit to the Rasch model, with acceptable internal consistency, satisfactory fit residuals, and no disordered threshold. Test-retest reliability showed high intraclass correlation coefficient estimates: .93 (95% confidence interval=0.86-0.96) for the PGQ activity subscale and .91 (95% confidence interval=0.84-0.95) for the PGQ symptom subscale. Limitations The PGQ should be compared with low back pain questionnaires as part of a concurrent evaluation of measurement properties, including validity and responsiveness to change.
CONCLUSIONS: The PGQ is the first condition-specific measure developed for people with PGP. The PGQ had acceptably high reliability and validity in people with PGP both during pregnancy and postpartum, it is simple to administer, and it is feasible for use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596959     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  23 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) into Brazilian Portuguese and clinimetric testing of the PGQ and Roland Morris questionnaire in pregnancy pelvic pain.

Authors:  Francine Mendonça de Luna Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Pelvic girdle pain 3-6 months after delivery in an unselected cohort of Norwegian women.

Authors:  Anne Marie Gausel; Inger Kjærmann; Stefan Malmqvist; Ingvild Dalen; Jan Petter Larsen; Inger Økland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Fatigability of the Lumbopelvic Stabilizing Muscles in Women 8 and 26 Weeks Postpartum.

Authors:  Rita E Deering; Jonathon Senefeld; Tatyana Pashibin; Donald A Neumann; Meredith Cruz; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Womens Health Phys Therap       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

4.  Level of activity limitations and predictors in women with pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Moges Gashaw; Melisew Mekie Yitayal; Ashenafi Zemed; Solomon Gedlu Nigatu; Alemu Kasaw; Daniel Gashaneh Belay; Fantu Mamo Aragaw; Mastewal Endalew; Nuhamin Tesfa Tsega; Melaku Hunie Asratie; Balamurugan Janakiraman
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire.

Authors:  Hui Cong; Heng Liu; Yin Sun; Jinsong Gao; Juntao Liu; Liangkun Ma; Britt Stuge; Lixia Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: listening to Australian women.

Authors:  Heather Pierce; Caroline S E Homer; Hannah G Dahlen; Jenny King
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-23

7.  Adherence, tolerance and effectiveness of two different pelvic support belts as a treatment for pregnancy-related symphyseal pain - a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Natasha A M S Flack; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Mark D Stringer; Andrew R Gray; Stephanie J Woodley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Pelvic Girdle Pain during or after Pregnancy: a review of recent evidence and a clinical care path proposal.

Authors:  E H Verstraete; G Vanderstraeten; W Parewijck
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

9.  Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Annelie Gutke; Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt; Monika Fagevik-Olsen; Hans-Christian Ostgaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124).

Authors:  Annette Bishop; Reuben Ogollah; Bernadette Bartlam; Panos Barlas; Melanie A Holden; Khaled M Ismail; Sue Jowett; Martyn Lewis; Alison Lloyd; Christine Kettle; Jesse Kigozi; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.