Literature DB >> 21596912

Mutant-prevention concentration and mechanism of resistance in clinical isolates and enrofloxacin/marbofloxacin-selected mutants of Escherichia coli of canine origin.

Elias Gebru1, Myung-Jin Choi1, Seung-Jin Lee1, Dereje Damte1, Seung Chun Park1.   

Abstract

The antibacterial activity and selection of resistant bacteria, along with mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance, were investigated by integrating the static [MIC or mutant-prevention concentration (MPC)] and in vitro dynamic model approaches using Escherichia coli isolates from diseased dogs. Using the dynamic models, selected E. coli strains and enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin at a range of simulated area under concentration-time curve over a 24 h interval (AUC(24 h))/MIC ratios were investigated. Our results indicated increasing losses in susceptibility of E. coli upon continuous exposure to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin in vitro. This effect was transferable to other fluoroquinolones, as well as to structurally unrelated drugs. Our results also confirmed an AUC(24 h)/MIC (AUC(24 h)/MPC)-dependent antibacterial activity and selection of resistant E. coli mutants, in which maximum losses in fluoroquinolone susceptibility occurred at simulated AUC(24 h)/MIC ratios of 40-60. AUC(24 h)/MPC ratios of 39 (enrofloxacin) and 32 (marbofloxacin) were considered protective against the selection of resistant mutants of E. coli. Integrating our MIC and MPC data with published pharmacokinetic information in dogs revealed a better effect of the conventional dosing regimen of marbofloxacin than that of enrofloxacin in restricting the selection of resistant mutants of E. coli. Target mutations, especially at codon 83 (serine to leucine) of gyrA, and overexpression of efflux pumps contributed to resistance development in both clinically resistant and in vitro-selected mutants of E. coli. We also report here a previously undescribed mutation at codon 116 of parC in two laboratory-derived resistant mutants of E. coli. Additional studies would determine the exact role of this mutation in fluoroquinolone susceptibility, as well as establish the importance of our findings in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596912     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.028654-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  12 in total

1.  Using In Vitro Dynamic Models To Evaluate Fluoroquinolone Activity against Emergence of Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Lee; Elias Gebru Awji; Na-Hye Park; Seung-Chun Park
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Bacterial resistance studies using in vitro dynamic models: the predictive power of the mutant prevention and minimum inhibitory antibiotic concentrations.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Elena N Strukova; Darya S Shlykova; Yury A Portnoy; Varvara K Kozyreva; Mikhail V Edelstein; Svetlana A Dovzhenko; Mikhail B Kobrin; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Searching for the Optimal Predictor of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae by Using In Vitro Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Elena N Strukova; Yury A Portnoy; Andrey V Romanov; Mikhail V Edelstein; Stephen H Zinner; Alexander A Firsov
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolates from canine urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Shao-Kuang Chang; Dan-Yuan Lo; Hen-Wei Wei; Hung-Chih Kuo
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  PMQR genes oqxAB and aac(6')Ib-cr accelerate the development of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  Marcus H Wong; Edward W Chan; Li Z Liu; Sheng Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Integration and Modeling of Enrofloxacin in Swine for Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jianyi Wang; Haihong Hao; Lingli Huang; Zhenli Liu; Dongmei Chen; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of sarafloxacin against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in Muscovy ducks.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Yu Feng Zhou; Jian Sun; Wei Shi; Xiao Ping Liao; Ya Hong Liu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Mutant prevention concentration of ozenoxacin for quinolone-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Y López; M Tato; D Gargallo-Viola; R Cantón; J Vila; I Zsolt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nisin Influence on the Antimicrobial Resistance Ability of Canine Oral Enterococci.

Authors:  Eva Cunha; Rita Janela; Margarida Costa; Luís Tavares; Ana Salomé Veiga; Manuela Oliveira
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10

10.  Mutant prevention concentration of orbifloxacin: comparison between Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius of canine origin.

Authors:  Takae Shimizu; Kazuki Harada; Yasushi Kataoka
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.