BACKGROUND: Household product ingestion is the second cause of visiting an Emergency Department for poisoning in children. Among these products, caustics are of great interest because of their potential toxicity and risk of sequelae. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological and clinical features of patients admitted to our hospital due to possible caustic ingestion. To analyse the risk factors associated with oesophageal or gastric injury. To review the latest treatment recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients admitted with suspicion of caustic ingestion between January 2005 and April 2010. Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were admitted, 45 (57.7%) were male, with a median age of 2.2 years (range: 1-17.3 years). In 13 cases the product was kept in a container different than the original. In 36 children, the family had induced vomiting or had given a liquid to dilute the product. Fifty two patients were symptomatic, and 46 of them had some sign on physical examination. Thirty nine oesophagoscopies were performed, and 7 oesophageal or gastric lesions were observed. When patients with normal and abnormal endoscopic findings were compared, the factors associated with an increased risk of mucosal injury were vomiting (P=0.01), and two or more symptoms at admission (P=0.03). No complication was described in patients without endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Family education about preventive and initial measures after caustic ingestion must be improved in an attempt to prevent wrong actions which can be harmful. Some patients might benefit from clinical observation without aggressive therapeutic measures.
BACKGROUND: Household product ingestion is the second cause of visiting an Emergency Department for poisoning in children. Among these products, caustics are of great interest because of their potential toxicity and risk of sequelae. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological and clinical features of patients admitted to our hospital due to possible caustic ingestion. To analyse the risk factors associated with oesophageal or gastric injury. To review the latest treatment recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients admitted with suspicion of caustic ingestion between January 2005 and April 2010. Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were admitted, 45 (57.7%) were male, with a median age of 2.2 years (range: 1-17.3 years). In 13 cases the product was kept in a container different than the original. In 36 children, the family had induced vomiting or had given a liquid to dilute the product. Fifty two patients were symptomatic, and 46 of them had some sign on physical examination. Thirty nine oesophagoscopies were performed, and 7 oesophageal or gastric lesions were observed. When patients with normal and abnormal endoscopic findings were compared, the factors associated with an increased risk of mucosal injury were vomiting (P=0.01), and two or more symptoms at admission (P=0.03). No complication was described in patients without endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Family education about preventive and initial measures after caustic ingestion must be improved in an attempt to prevent wrong actions which can be harmful. Some patients might benefit from clinical observation without aggressive therapeutic measures.