Literature DB >> 21596360

Domain general mechanisms account for imagined transformations of whole body perspective.

Mark R Gardner1, Rosalind Potts.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the contribution of domain general processes to imagined transformations of whole body perspective. In a task where participants make left-right judgements about a schematic human figure, reaction times made from the point of view of the figure are longer when the figure does not share the same spatial orientation as the participant and are substantially longer than those made from the participant's own point of view. These phenomena have been attributed to a specialised mechanism for imagined perspective transformations. In the present experiments, the effect of orientation on performance was influenced by factors that affect spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility; it was attenuated with reduced dimensional overlap and reversed by crossed S-R mappings. Performance in a control experiment in which no figure was present suggests that processes moderating S-R mappings may account for the effect of adopting another's point of view. Our findings demonstrate a role for domain general processes in imagined transformations of whole body perspective, imply that egocentric codes for spatial relationships within visually presented bodies are automatically generated, and undermine evidence for a specialised mechanism for imagined perspective transformations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596360     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  10 in total

1.  Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task.

Authors:  Mark May; Mike Wendt
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

2.  Imagined own-body transformations during passive self-motion.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-15

3.  Effects of arm crossing on spatial perspective-taking.

Authors:  Tiziano Furlanetto; Alberto Gallace; Caterina Ansuini; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Embodied perspective-taking indicated by selective disruption from aberrant self motion.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Chloé Stent; Christine Mohr; John F Golding
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

5.  Perceived Ownership of Avatars Influences Visual Perspective Taking.

Authors:  Christian Böffel; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-25

6.  Men perform comparably to women in a perspective taking task after administration of intranasal oxytocin but not after placebo.

Authors:  Angeliki Theodoridou; Angela C Rowe; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Strategy modulates spatial perspective-taking: evidence for dissociable disembodied and embodied routes.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Mark Brazier; Caroline J Edmonds; Petra C Gronholm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: Problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Mark May; Mike Wendt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fractionating the unitary notion of dissociation: disembodied but not embodied dissociative experiences are associated with exocentric perspective-taking.

Authors:  Jason J Braithwaite; Kelly James; Hayley Dewe; Nick Medford; Chie Takahashi; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Spatial-numerical associations in the presence of an avatar.

Authors:  C Böffel; C Herbst; O Lindemann; J Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-10-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.