Literature DB >> 21596257

Wavefront-guided epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis with mitomycin-C for myopia and myopic astigmatism: flap-on versus flap-off technique.

Robert Edward T Ang1, Karen B Reyes, Jo Anne P Hernandez, Hungwon Tchah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative pain, visual recovery, and outcomes of flap-on and flap-off epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (epi-LASIK) with mitomycin-C (MMC).
SETTING: Asian Eye Institute, Makati, Philippines.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
METHODS: Patients with myopia up to 9.00 diopters had wavefront-guided epi-LASIK with MMC. After randomization, the epithelium was removed in 1 eye (flap off) and repositioned in the other eye (flap on). Questionnaires were used to evaluate postoperative pain and visual recovery in each eye during the first postoperative week. Visual results, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 48 eyes. The mean pain scores were lower and better vision was perceived in the flap-off group during the first postoperative week. One year postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was -0.088 logMAR in the flap-on group and -0.036 logMAR in the flap-off group (P = .918). The spherical equivalent was within ± 0.50 D in 92% of eyes in both groups (P > .05). Forty-six percent in the flap-on group and 38% in the flap-off group gained 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity (P = .915). Contrast sensitivity tests under daytime and nighttime conditions were comparable. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean change in HOAs between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided epi-LASIK with MMC was effective, safe, and predictable in treating myopia and myopic astigmatism. Eyes that had flap-off epi-LASIK had less pain and faster visual recovery. Visual results, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and HOAs were comparable between groups. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596257     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

1.  Effects of higher-order aberrations on contrast sensitivity in normal eyes of a large myopic population.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zhao; Shi-Ming Li; Jing Lu; Hong-Min Song; Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus flap-off epipolis LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Junjie Piao; Woong-Joo Whang; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  A control-matched comparison of flap off and flap on laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Faisal M Tobaigy
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.