Literature DB >> 21595842

No (wo)man is an island--the influence of physicians' personal predisposition to labia minora appearance on their clinical decision making: a cross-sectional survey.

Welmoed Reitsma1, Marian J E Mourits, Merel Koning, Astrid Pascal, Berend van der Lei.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physicians are increasingly presented with women requesting a labia minora reduction procedure. AIM: To assess the influencing factor of personal predisposition in general practitioners, gynecologists, and plastic surgeons to labia minora appearance in relation to their willingness to refer for, or perform, a surgical labia minora reduction.
METHODS: Cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire survey. Between May 2009 and August 2009, 210 physicians were surveyed. Primary care: general practitioners working in the north of the Netherlands. Secondary care: gynecologists and plastic surgeons working in five hospitals in the north of the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A five-point Likert scale appraisal of four pictures showing a vulva, each displaying different sizes of labia minora, indicating a physician's personal predisposition, manifesting as willingness to refer for, or perform, a labia minora reduction.
RESULTS: A total of 164/210 (78.1%) physicians completed the questionnaire, consisting of 80 general practitioners, 41 gynecologists, and 43 plastic surgeons (96 males, 68 females). Ninety percent of all physicians believe, to a certain extent, that a vulva with very small labia minora represents society's ideal (2-5 on the Likert scale). More plastic surgeons regarded the picture with the largest labia minora as distasteful and unnatural, compared with general practitioners and gynecologists (P < 0.01), and regarded such a woman as a candidate for a labia minora reduction procedure (P < 0.001). Irrespective of the woman's labia minora size and the absence of physical complaints, plastic surgeons were significantly more open to performing a labia minora reduction procedure than gynecologists (P < 0.001). Male physicians were more inclined to opt for a surgical reduction procedure than their female colleagues (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The personal predisposition of physicians (taking account of their specific gender and specialty) concerning labia minora size and appearance influences their clinical decision making regarding a labia minora reduction procedure. Heightened awareness of one's personal predisposition vis-à-vis referral and willingness to operate is needed.
© 2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21595842     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02321.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

Review 1.  Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Indiana Mortimore; Elise P Jansma; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  The Attitude of Physicians Towards Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery.

Authors:  Dana Sawan; Malak Al-Marghoub; Ghaliah H Abduljabar; Mohammed Al-Marghoub; Faisal Kashgari; Nashwa Aldardeir; Hassan S Abduljabbar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11

3.  Is premenstrual dysphoric disorder really a disorder?

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes of breast reconstruction: Investigations into the correlation between the patients' Breast-Q outcome and the judgment of panels.

Authors:  Y Eltahir; E Bosma; N Teixeira; P M N Werker; G H de Bock
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 5.  Cosmetic labiaplasty on minors: a review of current trends and evidence.

Authors:  Andreas Kalampalikis; Lina Michala
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Body dysmorphic disorder of female genitalia: a qualitative study of Swiss obstetrician-gynecologists' experiences and practices.

Authors:  Olenka Dworakowski; Marie Drüge; Michelle Schlunegger; Birgit Watzke
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 7.  The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Furnas; Francisco L Canales; Rachel A Pedreira; Carly Comer; Samuel J Lin; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 8.  The contribution of online content to the promotion and normalisation of female genital cosmetic surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hayley Mowat; Karalyn McDonald; Amy Shields Dobson; Jane Fisher; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.809

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.