Wenjuan Wan1, Jay M Stewart. 1. University of California, San Francisco, Department of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California 94143-0730, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe a strategy for reducing the risk of posterior dislocation of a fluocinolone implant during exchange or removal. DESIGN: Case report and in vitro model. METHODS: Description of a surgical case and an in vitro experiment evaluating the role of infusion pressure in maintaining implant stability in surgery. RESULTS: Use of an elevated infusion pressure allowed safe removal of a fluocinolone implant that spontaneously dissociated into two pieces during removal. An in vitro model using the implant's drug reservoir in a cadaver eye demonstrated that the implant remained in a stable location at the scleral incision if the infusion pressure was high, whereas with a lower infusion pressure the implant spontaneously fell onto the posterior pole of the eye. CONCLUSIONS: During exchange or removal of a fluocinolone implant, an elevated infusion pressure may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation of the device.
PURPOSE: To describe a strategy for reducing the risk of posterior dislocation of a fluocinolone implant during exchange or removal. DESIGN: Case report and in vitro model. METHODS: Description of a surgical case and an in vitro experiment evaluating the role of infusion pressure in maintaining implant stability in surgery. RESULTS: Use of an elevated infusion pressure allowed safe removal of a fluocinolone implant that spontaneously dissociated into two pieces during removal. An in vitro model using the implant's drug reservoir in a cadaver eye demonstrated that the implant remained in a stable location at the scleral incision if the infusion pressure was high, whereas with a lower infusion pressure the implant spontaneously fell onto the posterior pole of the eye. CONCLUSIONS: During exchange or removal of a fluocinolone implant, an elevated infusion pressure may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation of the device.
Authors: Janet T Holbrook; Elizabeth A Sugar; Alyce E Burke; Albert T Vitale; Jennifer E Thorne; Janet L Davis; Douglas A Jabs Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 5.258