CONCLUSION: Treatment of traumatic tympanic membrane (TM) perforation with everted or involute edge flaps at different time intervals within 1 week after the injury did not affect the perforation closure rate and mean closure time. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the effect of treatment at different time intervals for traumatic tympanic membrane perforation with gelatin sponge patch and edge approximation plus gelfoam patching. METHODS: Patients with traumatic TM perforation visited at different days since the injury for medical treatment (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 days post trauma). These patients were treated with the following prominent methods of treatment: gelatin sponge patch treatment and edge approximation plus gelfoam patching. Measurement indicators were perforation closure rate and mean closure time at 3 months. RESULTS: In the group treated with the gelatin sponge patch technique, the patients sought medical treatment at different time intervals since the injury. Accordingly, the outcome of the treatment varied in terms of the perforation closure rates achieved in different patients in this group. The respective perforation closure rates were 100%, 100%, 96%, 94%, and 89% in accordance with the time interval at which the patients were treated since the injury. The results were not significantly different when compared by statistical analysis (p > 0.05); the mean closure times in each of the different sets of cases in this group were calculated and the following values were reported: 7.1 ± 2.3, 8.2 ± 1.6, 8.7 ± 1.2, 9.2 ± 3.1, and 10.7 ± 3.9 days. On the other hand, in the edge approximation plus gelfoam patching group, the perforation closure rates were 100%, 97%, 96%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. This was in accordance with the time elapsed since the injury for the patients who visited the hospital on different days. Statistical analysis confirmed that the perforation closure rates for the different cases of this group did not have any significant difference (p > 0.05); the mean closure times were 7.6 ± 1.9, 7.9 ± 2.2, 9.2 ± 2.8, 8.5 ± 3.6, and 11.2 ± 4.1 days, respectively, indicating that differences were not significant even in terms of mean closure rates for the different cases of this group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of traumatic tympanic membrane (TM) perforation with everted or involute edge flaps at different time intervals within 1 week after the injury did not affect the perforation closure rate and mean closure time. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the effect of treatment at different time intervals for traumatic tympanic membrane perforation with gelatin sponge patch and edge approximation plus gelfoam patching. METHODS:Patients with traumatic TM perforation visited at different days since the injury for medical treatment (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 days post trauma). These patients were treated with the following prominent methods of treatment: gelatin sponge patch treatment and edge approximation plus gelfoam patching. Measurement indicators were perforation closure rate and mean closure time at 3 months. RESULTS: In the group treated with the gelatin sponge patch technique, the patients sought medical treatment at different time intervals since the injury. Accordingly, the outcome of the treatment varied in terms of the perforation closure rates achieved in different patients in this group. The respective perforation closure rates were 100%, 100%, 96%, 94%, and 89% in accordance with the time interval at which the patients were treated since the injury. The results were not significantly different when compared by statistical analysis (p > 0.05); the mean closure times in each of the different sets of cases in this group were calculated and the following values were reported: 7.1 ± 2.3, 8.2 ± 1.6, 8.7 ± 1.2, 9.2 ± 3.1, and 10.7 ± 3.9 days. On the other hand, in the edge approximation plus gelfoam patching group, the perforation closure rates were 100%, 97%, 96%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. This was in accordance with the time elapsed since the injury for the patients who visited the hospital on different days. Statistical analysis confirmed that the perforation closure rates for the different cases of this group did not have any significant difference (p > 0.05); the mean closure times were 7.6 ± 1.9, 7.9 ± 2.2, 9.2 ± 2.8, 8.5 ± 3.6, and 11.2 ± 4.1 days, respectively, indicating that differences were not significant even in terms of mean closure rates for the different cases of this group (p > 0.05).