Literature DB >> 21595007

Ethnic disparities in the perception of ethical risks from psychiatric genetic studies.

E A Nwulia1, M M Hipolito, S Aamir, W B Lawson, J I Nurnberger.   

Abstract

To examine if ethnic differences in concerns about unfavorable consequences from psychiatric genetic studies, existing between non-Hispanic Black and White populations, persist among participants in an actual genetic study of bipolar disorder. Historically, minority subjects have been less willing to participate in such studies. Participants in the US Bipolar Genome Study (BIGS) were assessed on six items of concerns in the Questionnaire on Genetic Risk (QGR). Each item had five response categories, ranging from "not at all" concerned to "very concerned." Responses from Black (N = 188) and White participants (N = 1,065) formed the base for this analysis. Concerns about unfavorable consequences of conducting psychiatric genetic studies were prevalent in the whole sample. Concern for medical insurance was most prevalent (63.4%), followed by job concern (58.8%) and stigma (57.4%). Racial discrimination was less prevalent (28.1%). Blacks endorsed significantly stronger concerns for all consequences except the medical insurance item (P < 0.008). The most significant ethnic disparity in concerns was for racial discrimination (P < 0.0001). Associations between levels of concern and ethnicity remained significant after adjustments for other factors in multivariate models. Ethnic differences (Blacks vs. Whites) in perceived concerns about unfavorable consequences from participation persist among participants in an actual psychiatric genetic study. This suggests that other factors may play a more critical role in the decision not to participate. Future studies should investigate more comprehensive sources of barriers to consenting for ongoing psychiatric genetic studies in representative samples, incorporating assessments from non-participants as well as participants.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21595007     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet        ISSN: 1552-4841            Impact factor:   3.568


  10 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of a decision aid for inviting parents to participate in a fragile X newborn screening pilot study.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Megan A Lewis; Shelly L Harris; Tracey Grant; Carla Bann; Ellen Bishop; Myra Roche; Sonia Guarda; Leah Barnum; Cynthia Powell; Bradford L Therrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Receptiveness to participation in genetic research: A pilot study comparing views of people with depression, diabetes, or no illness.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Recruiting for diversity: a pilot test of recruitment strategies for a national alcohol survey with mail-in genetic data collection.

Authors:  Karen G Chartier; Priscilla Martinez; Cory Cummings; Brien P Riley; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Culturally Sensitive Approaches to Identification and Treatment of Depression among HIV Infected African American Adults: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Huynh-Nhu Le; Maria Mananita S Hipolito; Sharon Lambert; Flora Terrell-Hamilton; Narayan Rai; Charlee McLean; Suad Kapetanovic; Evaristus Nwulia
Journal:  J Depress Anxiety       Date:  2016-04-03

5.  Views of Black nurses toward genetic research and testing.

Authors:  Yolanda M Powell-Young; Ida J Spruill
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Public awareness of genetic nondiscrimination laws in four states and perceived importance of life insurance protections.

Authors:  Alicia A Parkman; Joan Foland; Beth Anderson; Debra Duquette; Holly Sobotka; Mary Lynn; Shelley Nottingham; William David Dotson; Katherine Kolor; Summer L Cox
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Cognitive and Affective Responses to Mass-media Based Genetic Risk Information in a Socio-demographically Diverse Sample of Smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Nicole Ackerman; Courtney S Wheeler
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-09-16

Review 8.  Racial disparities in bipolar disorder treatment and research: a call to action.

Authors:  Margaret O Akinhanmi; Joanna M Biernacka; Stephen M Strakowski; Susan L McElroy; Joyce E Balls Berry; Kathleen R Merikangas; Shervin Assari; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas G Schulze; Marion LeBoyer; Carol Tamminga; Christi Patten; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 9.  Use of next generation sequencing technologies in research and beyond: are participants with mental health disorders fully protected?

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Ghislaine Mathieu; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.

Authors:  Ellen W Clayton; Colin M Halverson; Nila A Sathe; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.