Literature DB >> 21594948

Quantification of postsynaptic density proteins: glutamate receptor subunits and scaffolding proteins.

Yoshiaki Shinohara1.   

Abstract

The postsynaptic density (PSD) protein complex has long been a major target of proteomics in neuroscience. As the number of glutamate receptors on a synapse is one of the main determinants of synaptic efficacy, determining the absolute numbers of receptors in the PSD is necessary for estimating the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in individual synapses. Moreover, as the receptor molecules are embedded in a macromolecular complex within the PSD, stoichiometry between the receptors and other PSD proteins could help explain the functional and regional specialization of the synapses and their possible roles in synaptic plasticity. Here, I review various studies concerned with the quantification of PSD proteins.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21594948     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative mass spectrometry measurements reveal stoichiometry of principal postsynaptic density proteins.

Authors:  Mark S Lowenthal; Sanford P Markey; Ayse Dosemeci
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  Recent advances in quantitative neuroproteomics.

Authors:  George E Craft; Anshu Chen; Angus C Nairn
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Proteomic Analysis of Postsynaptic Protein Complexes Underlying Neuronal Plasticity.

Authors:  Anthony J Baucum
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  AVP(4-8) Improves Cognitive Behaviors and Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity in the APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Xiumin Zhang; Fang Zhao; Chenfang Wang; Jun Zhang; Yu Bai; Fang Zhou; Zhaojun Wang; Meina Wu; Wei Yang; Junhong Guo; Jinshun Qi
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Nanoscale co-organization and coactivation of AMPAR, NMDAR, and mGluR at excitatory synapses.

Authors:  Julia Goncalves; Tomas M Bartol; Côme Camus; Florian Levet; Ana Paula Menegolla; Terrence J Sejnowski; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita; Michel Vivaudou; Daniel Choquet; Eric Hosy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stress-induced Changes in the S-palmitoylation and S-nitrosylation of Synaptic Proteins.

Authors:  Monika Zareba-Koziol; Anna Bartkowiak-Kaczmarek; Izabela Figiel; Adam Krzystyniak; Tomasz Wojtowicz; Monika Bijata; Jakub Wlodarczyk
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Effects of curcumin on synapses in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice.

Authors:  Yingkun He; Pengwen Wang; Peng Wei; Huili Feng; Ying Ren; Jinduo Yang; Yingxue Rao; Jing Shi; Jinzhou Tian
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.219

8.  The Notch ligand E3 ligase, Mind Bomb1, regulates glutamate receptor localization in Drosophila.

Authors:  Morgan Sturgeon; Dustin Davis; Amanda Albers; Derek Beatty; Rik Austin; Matt Ferguson; Brittany Tounsel; Faith L W Liebl
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.314

9.  L-3-n-Butylphthalide improves synaptic and dendritic spine plasticity and ameliorates neurite pathology in Alzheimer's disease mouse model and cultured hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  Longjian Huang; Jiaqi Lan; Jingshu Tang; Yuying Kang; Xinhong Feng; Lei Wu; Ying Peng
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.590

10.  Reduced levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor contribute to synaptic imbalance during the critical period of respiratory development in rats.

Authors:  Xiu-Ping Gao; Qiuli Liu; Bindu Nair; Margaret T T Wong-Riley
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.