Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used to treat patients with leukaemia driven by BCR-ABL1 (ref. 1) and other oncogenic tyrosine kinases. Recent efforts have focused on developing more potent TKIs that also inhibit mutant tyrosine kinases. However, even effective TKIs typically fail to eradicate leukaemia-initiating cells (LICs), which often cause recurrence of leukaemia after initially successful treatment. Here we report the discovery of a novel mechanism of drug resistance, which is based on protective feedback signalling of leukaemia cells in response to treatment with TKI. We identify BCL6 as a central component of this drug-resistance pathway and demonstrate that targeted inhibition of BCL6 leads to eradication of drug-resistant and leukaemia-initiating subclones.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used to treat patients with leukaemia driven by BCR-ABL1 (ref. 1) and other oncogenic tyrosine kinases. Recent efforts have focused on developing more potent TKIs that also inhibit mutant tyrosine kinases. However, even effective TKIs typically fail to eradicate leukaemia-initiating cells (LICs), which often cause recurrence of leukaemia after initially successful treatment. Here we report the discovery of a novel mechanism of drug resistance, which is based on protective feedback signalling of leukaemia cells in response to treatment with TKI. We identify BCL6 as a central component of this drug-resistance pathway and demonstrate that targeted inhibition of BCL6 leads to eradication of drug-resistant and leukaemia-initiating subclones.
To elucidate mechanisms of TKI-resistance in tyrosine kinase-driven leukemia, we performed a gene expression analysis including our and published data of TKI-treated leukemia. We identified BCL6 as a top-ranking gene in a set of recurrent gene expression changes10, some of which are shared with MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E mutant solid tumor cells11 (Supplementary Fig. 2–3). TKI-induced upregulation of BCL6 mRNA levels was confirmed in multiple leukemia subtypes carrying oncogenic tyrosine kinases (Supplementary Fig. 2). The BCR-ABL1 kinase, encoded by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), represents the most frequent genetic lesion in adult ALL, defines the subtype with a particularly poor prognosis1,4,5 and was therefore chosen as focus for this study.To elucidate the regulation of BCL6 in Ph+ ALL, we investigated the JAK2/STAT512 and PI3K/AKT13 pathways downstream of BCR-ABL1. We and others have shown that STAT5 suppresses BCL6 in B cells14–16. TKI-mediated upregulation of BCL6 was diminished by constitutively active STAT5(Fig. 1b) and deletion of STAT5 was sufficient to upregulate BCL6, even in the absence of TKI-treatment (Fig. 1c). In agreement with previous work16, overexpression of FoxO4 induced BCL6 (Fig. 1d). In Ph+ ALL cells, FoxO factors are inactivated by PI3K/AKT13 signaling, which is reversed by Pten (Supplementary Fig. 4). Deletion of Pten, hence, abrogated the ability of the leukemia cells to upregulate BCL6 in response to TKI-treatment (Fig. 1e).
Figure 1
Regulation of BCL6 expression in BCR-ABL1 ALL cells
a, Ph+ ALL cells were treated with and without Imatinib (10 μmol/l) for 24 hours. Upregulation of BCL6 was compared to expression levels in DLBCL with BCL6-IGH translocation by Western blot. b, BCR-ABL1-transformed mouse ALL cells were transduced with a constitutively active Stat5 mutant (STAT5-CA) or a control vector (GFP) and treated either with or without Imatinib. BCL6 Western blot was performed using β-actin as loading control. c, BCL6 expression upon Imatinib-treatment was studied by Western blot in the presence or absence of Cre-mediated deletion of Stat5 in BCR-ABL1-transformed Stat5fl/fl mouse ALL. d, Mouse BCR-ABL1 ALL cells were transduced with FoxO4-Puromycin or a Puromycin control vector and subjected to antibiotic selection. Cells were harvested and BCL6 mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR relative to Hprt. e, Imatinib-induced BCL6 expression was studied by Western blot in the presence or absence of Cre-mediated deletion of Pten in BCR-ABL1-transformed Ptenfl/fl mouse ALL cells.
In DLBCL, BCL6 is frequently translocated and suppresses p53-mediated apoptosis9,17. While TKI-treatment is less effective in p53−/− Ph+ ALL18, recent studies showed that TKI paradoxically prevent the upregulation of p53 in response to DNA damage in Ph+ ALL and CML19,20. A comparative gene expression analysis of BCL6−/− and BCL6+/+ ALL cells (Supplementary Fig. 5) identified Cdkn2a (Arf), Cdkn1a (p21), p53 and p53bp1 as potential BCL6 target genes (Supplementary Fig. 6). Arf and p53 protein levels were indeed unrestrained in BCL6−/− ALL (Fig. 2a). TKI-treatment of BCL6+/+ ALL resulted in strong upregulation of BCL6 with low levels of p53, while BCL6−/−ALL cells failed to curb p53 expression levels (Supplementary Fig. 7). Likewise, TKI-treatment increased excessively p53 levels when Pten-deficient ALL cells failed to upregulate BCL6 (Fig. 1e).
Figure 2
BCL6 is required for transcriptional inactivation of the Arf/p53 pathway in BCR-ABL1 ALL
a, Western blot analysis of CDKN2A (Arf) and p53 expression in BCL6−/− and BCL6+/+
BCR-ABL1 ALL cells. b, Human Ph+ ALL cells (Tom1) were treated with and without Imatinib (10 μmol/l) for 24 hours and were subjected to ChIP-on-chip analysis using a BCL6-specific antibody. The y-axis indicates enrichment versus input and the x-axis the location of probes within the respective loci relative to the transcriptional start site. The dark and light green (Control) or red (Imatinib) tracings depict two replicates. Recruitment to CDKN1A, CDKN1B, TP53 and HPRT (negative control) is shown in Ph+ ALL cells and one DLBCL cell line (OCI-Ly7). c, Cell cycle analysis (BrdU/7-AAD staining). d, Staining for senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal). ALL cells were treated with or without 0.05 μg/ml adriamycin for 48 hours to induce a low level of DNA damage. Percentages of SA-β-gal+ cells are indicated (means ± SD; n=3).
Identifying direct targets of BCL6 by chromatin immunoprecipitation in Ph+ ALL (Supplementary Fig. 8–11), p53, p21 and p27 were among the genes with the strongest recruitment of BCL6 in TKI-treated ALL (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 9–11). Given that cell cycle-arrest and senescence-associated genes were among the BCL6 targets, we studied the cell cycle profile of leukemia cells. BCL6−/− ALL cells divided at a slightly reduced rate compared to BCL6+/+ ALL cells (Fig. 2c). Treatment with adriamycin (0.05 μg/ml) had no significant effect on BCL6+/+ ALL cells in a senescence-associated β-galactosidase assay21–22 but revealed that the vast majority of BCL6−/− leukemia cells was poised to undergo cellular senescence (Fig. 2d). These findings demonstrate that even low levels of BCL6 in the absence of TKI-treatment are critical to downregulate Arf/p53.Clonal evolution of leukemia involves acquisition of genetic lesions through DNA damage23. Interestingly, a CGH analysis revealed that genetic lesions were less frequent in BCL6 deficient ALL (Supplementary Fig. 12), suggesting that increased sensitivity to DNA damage limits clonal evolution in the absence of BCL6. Since Arf and p53 are critical negative regulators of self-renewal24, we performed colony-forming assays. The colony frequencies of BCL6−/− ALL cells were reduced by ~20-fold compared to BCL6+/+ ALL (Fig. 3a). To study self-renewal in vivo, we measured the ability of BCL6+/+ and BCL6−/− ALL cells to initiate leukemia in transplant recipients (Fig. 3b). Using luciferase bioimaging, leukemia engraftment was observed in both groups after 8 days. BCL6+/+ ALL cells rapidly expanded and initiated fatal leukemia, whereas BCL6−/− ALL cells failed to expand from the initial engraftment foci (Fig. 3c). Some mice that received BCL6−/− ALL cells ultimately succumbed to leukemia (Fig. 3b). Flow cytometry, however, revealed that the leukemias in the BCL6−/− group were in fact derived from endogenous CD45.1+ cells of the irradiated recipients and not from the injected CD45.2+ donor ALL cells (Supplementary Fig. 13; asterisks in Fig. 3b).
Figure 3
BCL6 is required for leukemia-initiation in BCR-ABL1 ALL
a, 10,000 BCL6−/− or BCL6+/+
BCR-ABL1 ALL cells were plated in semisolid agar, and colonies were counted after ten days (numbers denote means ± SD, n=3). b, Overall survival of mice injected with 100,000 BCL6−/− and BCL6+/+
BCR-ABL1 ALL cells was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. c, For a SCID leukemia-initiating cell (SL-IC) experiment, BCL6−/− and BCL6+/+
BCR-ABL1 ALL cells were labeled with firefly luciferase and were intravenously injected into sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mice. Mice that developed CD45.1+ endogenous leukemia instead of leukemia from injected CD45.2+ cells are indicated by asterisks (see Supplementary Fig. 13). d, The SL-IC assay was repeated as a limiting dilution experiment (103, 104, 105, 5 million cells) and leukemia cells were directly injected into the femoral bone marrow to circumvent potential engraftment defects.
Defective leukemia-initiation may be a consequence of impaired homing to the bone marrow niche. Indeed, BCL6−/− ALL cells lack expression of CD44 (Supplementary Fig. 14), which is critical for homing of BCR-ABL1leukemia-initiating cells (LIC) to the bone marrow microenvironment25. Retroviral reconstitution of CD44 markedly increased homing of BCL6−/− ALL cells to the bone marrow niche, but failed to rescue defective leukemia-initiation (Supplementary Fig. 14).Using intrafemoral injection to circumvent homing defects, a limiting dilution experiment (Fig. 3d) showed that 5 million BCL6−/− ALL cells compared to only 103 BCL6+/+ ALL cells were needed to initiate fatal leukemia. These findings suggest that the frequency of LIC in BCL6−/− ALL (<1 in 100,000) is reduced by >100-fold compared to BCL6+/+ ALL (≥1 in 1,000). An alternative interpretation would be that LIC occur at a similar frequency in BCL6−/− ALL but with reduced self-renewal activity. To address potential “exhaustion” of LIC, we performed a serial transplantation with ALL cells that gave rise to disease in primary recipients after injection of 5 million ALL cells. From the bone marrow, we isolated CD19+ ALL cells for secondary intrafemoral injection. BCL6−/− leukemia was not transplantable in secondary recipients (Supplementary Fig. 15). While these findings do not rule out the possibility that the LIC frequencies are reduced in BCL6−/− ALL, they support the notion of LIC “exhaustion” after secondary transplantation.To explore the therapeutic usefulness of pharmacological inhibition of BCL6, we tested a BCL6 inhibitor (RI-BPI), which blocks the repressor activity of BCL626. Gene expression analysis confirmed that RI-BPI is a selective and potent inhibitor of BCL6 (Supplementary Fig. 16). We investigated the effect of RI-BPI on the self-renewal capacity of primary Ph+ ALL and the initiation of leukemia in a mouse xenograft model. Treatment with RI-BPI resulted in a reduction of colony formation and delayed progression of leukemia. Likewise, treatment of Ph+ ALL with RI-BPI induced cellular senescence (Supplementary Fig. 17).We next examined how gene dosage of BCL6 affects responses to TKI. For instance, Pten−/− ALL cells lack the ability to upregulate the p53-repressor BCL6 and are more sensitive to Imatinib (Fig. 1e; Supplementary Fig. 18). Dose-response studies in BCL6+/+, BCL6+/− and BCL6−/− ALL (Fig. 4a) showed that Imatinib-sensitivity was significantly increased in BCL6−/− (EC50: 0.17 μmol/l) and even in BCL6+/− ALL cells (EC50: 0.67 μmol/l) compared to BCL6+/+ ALL cells (EC50: 1.10 μmol/l; Fig. 4a). These findings indicate that maximum levels of BCL6 expression are required to prevent TKI-induced cell death. Indeed, inducible activation of BCL6-ERT2 constructs27 in BCL6−/− ALL cells conferred a strong survival advantage in the presence of Imatinib (Fig. 4b). Activation of BCL6 in BCL6+/+ ALL cells induced cell cycle exit (not shown) and no additional survival advantage, because these cells already achieved maximal upregulation of endogenous BCL6 (Fig. 1a).
Figure 4
BCL6 promotes survival of TKI-treated BCR-ABL1 ALL cells
a, Imatinib-sensitivity of BCL6−/−, BCL6+/− and BCL6+/+ ALL cells was measured in a Resazurin viability assay. b, BCL6−/− ALL cells were transduced with BCL6-ERT2 or ERT2 vectors (tagged with GFP). ALL cells were treated with or without 1 μmol/l Imatinib, and BCL6-ERT2 or ERT2 were induced by 4-OHT. Relative changes of GFP+ cells after induction are indicated. c, Patient-derived Ph+ ALL cells (ICN1) were transduced with inducible dominant-negative BCL6 (DN-BCL6-ERT2) or ERT2 control vectors. ALL cells were treated with or without 10 μmol/l Imatinib and DN-BCL6-ERT2 or ERT2 were induced by 4-OHT. Relative changes of GFP+ cells after induction are indicated. d, Patient-derived Ph+ ALL cells (TXL2) were labeled with luciferase and 100,000 cells were injected. Mice were treated 7 times with either vehicle (gray), Nilotinib (25 mg/kg; green) or a combination of Nilotinib and RI-BPI (25 mg/kg; red). Treated mice are shown in e, a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Treatment days are indicated by arrow heads.
To address the role of BCL6-mediated repression of p53 in TKI-resistance, p53−/− and p53+/+ ALL cells were treated with RI-BPI. The synergistic effect between TKI-treatment and RI-BPI is indeed partially p53-dependent (Supplementary Fig. 19). In p53−/− ALL cells, the effect of RI-BPI was significantly diminished compared to p53+/+ ALL.To confirm that BCL6 has a similar function in patient-derived Ph+ ALL, primary ALL cells were transduced with a dominant-negative BCL6 mutant (DN-BCL6-ERT2)27, which resulted in a marked competitive disadvantage of Ph+ ALL cells, that was further enhanced by Imatinib treatment (Fig. 4c). Similar observations in mouse ALL and in an established Ph+ ALL cell line demonstrate that BCL6 promotes survival of TKI-treated Ph+ ALL (Supplementary Fig. 20).To test the effect of BCL6 inhibition on TKI-resistance, we cultured 4 primary Ph+ ALL in the presence or absence of Imatinib, RI-BPI or a combination of both (Supplementary Fig. 21). Initially, all 4 Ph+ ALL cases responded to Imatinib treatment, but subsequently rebounded and were no longer sensitive to Imatinib (10 μmol/l). RI-BPI alone showed only slight effects, while the combination of RI-BPI and Imatinib rapidly induced cell death and effectively prevented a rebound in all 4 cases (Supplementary Fig. 21). These findings suggest that prolonged treatment with a combination of Imatinib/RI-BPI prevents acquisition of TKI-resistance. We next examined the effect of Imatinib/RI-BPI combinations on primary TKI-resistance in Ph+ ALL. To this end, 4 human Ph+ ALL cell lines that lack BCR-ABL1 kinase mutations (Supplementary Table 1) but are highly refractory to Imatinib (10 μmol/l) were treated with or without Imatinib, RI-BPI or a combination of both. Imatinib alone did not achieve a therapeutic response, whereas the combination with RI-BPI potentiated the effect of Imatinib on the refractory ALL cells (Supplementary Fig. 22).To study the efficacy of combined tyrosine kinase and BCL6 inhibition in vivo, primary Ph+ ALL cells were labeled with luciferase and xenografted into mice. Recipient mice were treated with either vehicle, Nilotinib or a combination of Nilotinib and RI-BPI. Nilotinib is more potent than Imatinib, which only has marginal effects in mice28,29. Bioimaging demonstrated that 7–10 injections of RI-BPI significantly enhanced the effect of Nilotinib (Fig. 4d–e and Supplementary Fig. 23). While all mice treated with Nilotinib alone succumbed to leukemia within 99 days after injection, 7 of 8 mice treated with RI-BPI/Nilotinib combination were still alive after 140 days (Fig. 4d–e). Also in a model for full-blown mouseleukemia, TKI/RI-BPI combinations proved effective and significantly prolonged survival (Supplementary Fig. 24). Establishing a potential therapeutic window of Nilotinib/RI-BPI combinations, we found no evidence of relevant toxicity (Supplementary Fig. 25–26; Supplementary Table 2).Although transcription factors have been considered intractable therapeutic targets, the recent development of a small molecule inhibitor against BCL630 holds promise to effectively target TKI-resistance in patients with Ph+ ALL. Since TKI-resistance develops in virtually all cases of Ph+ ALL, it appears particularly important to target this novel pathway of TKI-resistance.
Methods summary
Cell culture
Primary leukemia cells (Supplementary Table 1) were cultured on OP9 stroma cells in Alpha MEM without ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides, supplemented with 20% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Human ALL cell lines were maintained in RPMI with GlutaMAX containing 20% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. MouseBCR-ABL1-transformed ALL cells were maintained in IMDM with GlutaMAX containing 20% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Cell cultures were kept at 37°C in a humidified incubator under a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
BCR-ABL1 transformation
Transfection of a MSCV-based retroviral vector encoding BCR-ABL1 was performed using Lipofectamine 2000. Retroviral supernatant was produced by co-transfecting 293FT cells with the plasmids pHIT60 and pHIT123. Virus supernatant were harvested, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter and loaded by centrifugation (2,000 × g, 90 min at 32°C) on 50μg/ml RetroNectin coated non-tissue well plates. Extracted bone marrow cells from mice were transduced by BCR-ABL1 in the presence of 10 ng/ml recombinant murineInterleukin-7 (IL-7) in RetroNectin-coated petri dishes.
Authors: Scott A Armstrong; Andrew L Kung; Meghann E Mabon; Lewis B Silverman; Ronald W Stam; Monique L Den Boer; Rob Pieters; John H Kersey; Stephen E Sallan; Jonathan A Fletcher; Todd R Golub; James D Griffin; Stanley J Korsmeyer Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Silvia Fernández de Mattos; Abdelkader Essafi; Inês Soeiro; Alexandra M Pietersen; Kim U Birkenkamp; Corinne S Edwards; Anthony Martino; Brad H Nelson; Julia M Francis; Marius C Jones; Jan J Brosens; Paul J Coffer; Eric W-F Lam Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Susan M Graham; Heather G Jørgensen; Elaine Allan; Charlie Pearson; Michael J Alcorn; Linda Richmond; Tessa L Holyoake Journal: Blood Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: N Meydan; T Grunberger; H Dadi; M Shahar; E Arpaia; Z Lapidot; J S Leeder; M Freedman; A Cohen; A Gazit; A Levitzki; C M Roifman Journal: Nature Date: 1996-02-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: B J Druker; C L Sawyers; H Kantarjian; D J Resta; S F Reese; J M Ford; R Capdeville; M Talpaz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cihangir Duy; J Jessica Yu; Rahul Nahar; Srividya Swaminathan; Soo-Mi Kweon; Jose M Polo; Ester Valls; Lars Klemm; Seyedmehdi Shojaee; Leandro Cerchietti; Wolfgang Schuh; Hans-Martin Jäck; Christian Hurtz; Parham Ramezani-Rad; Sebastian Herzog; Hassan Jumaa; H Phillip Koeffler; Ignacio Moreno de Alborán; Ari M Melnick; B Hilda Ye; Markus Müschen Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Matthew R Janes; Jose J Limon; Lomon So; Jing Chen; Raymond J Lim; Melissa A Chavez; Collin Vu; Michael B Lilly; Sharmila Mallya; S Tiong Ong; Marina Konopleva; Michael B Martin; Pingda Ren; Yi Liu; Christian Rommel; David A Fruman Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Hayley S Ma; Sarah M Greenblatt; Courtney M Shirley; Amy S Duffield; J Kyle Bruner; Li Li; Bao Nguyen; Eric Jung; Peter D Aplan; Gabriel Ghiaur; Richard J Jones; Donald Small Journal: Blood Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Suhu Liu; Sarah R Walker; Erik A Nelson; Robert Cerulli; Michael Xiang; Patricia A Toniolo; Jun Qi; Richard M Stone; Martha Wadleigh; James E Bradner; David A Frank Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Thanh-Trang T Vo; J Scott Lee; Duc Nguyen; Brandon Lui; William Pandori; Andrew Khaw; Sharmila Mallya; Mengrou Lu; Markus Müschen; Marina Konopleva; David A Fruman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: S Takao; W Chien; V Madan; D-C Lin; L-W Ding; Q-Y Sun; A Mayakonda; M Sudo; L Xu; Y Chen; Y-Y Jiang; S Gery; M Lill; E Park; W Senapedis; E Baloglu; M Müschen; H P Koeffler Journal: Leukemia Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 11.528