BACKGROUND: Subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) is considered the most common type of vascular dementia and often follows a slowly progressive course, simulating Alzheimer disease (AD). Whether the progressive cognitive decline is associated with pure SVaD or concomitant AD remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine what proportion of patients with SVaD lack abnormal amyloid imaging, and to examine differences in the clinical or MRI features between subjects with SVaD with cortical amyloid deposition and those without. METHODS: We measured brain amyloid deposition using (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET in 45 patients (men: women = 19:26; mean age 74.2 ± 7.6 years) with SVaD. They all met DSM-IV criteria for vascular dementia and had severe white matter high signal intensities without territorial infarction or macrohemorrhage on MRI. RESULTS: Thirty-one (68.9%) of 45 patients with SVaD were negative for cortical PiB binding. There was significant difference between (11)C-PiB-positive and (11)C-PiB-negative groups in terms of age (79.5 vs 71.9 years), Mini-Mental State Examination score (18.6 vs 22.6), the number of lacunes (3.9 vs 9.0), and the visual rating scale of hippocampal atrophy (3.1 vs 2.3). The neuropsychological assessments revealed that patients with (11)C-PiB-negative SVaD performed better on the delayed recall of both the verbal and visual memory test than did those with (11)C-PiB-positive scan. CONCLUSION: SVaD without abnormal amyloid imaging was more common than expected. Patients with SVaD with and without abnormal amyloid imaging differed in clinical and MRI features, although there was considerable overlap.
BACKGROUND:Subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) is considered the most common type of vascular dementia and often follows a slowly progressive course, simulating Alzheimer disease (AD). Whether the progressive cognitive decline is associated with pure SVaD or concomitant AD remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine what proportion of patients with SVaD lack abnormal amyloid imaging, and to examine differences in the clinical or MRI features between subjects with SVaD with cortical amyloid deposition and those without. METHODS: We measured brain amyloid deposition using (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET in 45 patients (men: women = 19:26; mean age 74.2 ± 7.6 years) with SVaD. They all met DSM-IV criteria for vascular dementia and had severe white matter high signal intensities without territorial infarction or macrohemorrhage on MRI. RESULTS: Thirty-one (68.9%) of 45 patients with SVaD were negative for cortical PiB binding. There was significant difference between (11)C-PiB-positive and (11)C-PiB-negative groups in terms of age (79.5 vs 71.9 years), Mini-Mental State Examination score (18.6 vs 22.6), the number of lacunes (3.9 vs 9.0), and the visual rating scale of hippocampal atrophy (3.1 vs 2.3). The neuropsychological assessments revealed that patients with (11)C-PiB-negative SVaD performed better on the delayed recall of both the verbal and visual memory test than did those with (11)C-PiB-positive scan. CONCLUSION: SVaD without abnormal amyloid imaging was more common than expected. Patients with SVaD with and without abnormal amyloid imaging differed in clinical and MRI features, although there was considerable overlap.
Authors: Natalie L Marchant; Bruce R Reed; Charles S DeCarli; Cindee M Madison; Michael W Weiner; Helena C Chui; William J Jagust Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: E Cavedo; S Lista; Z Khachaturian; P Aisen; P Amouyel; K Herholz; C R Jack; R Sperling; J Cummings; K Blennow; S O'Bryant; G B Frisoni; A Khachaturian; M Kivipelto; W Klunk; K Broich; S Andrieu; M Thiebaut de Schotten; J-F Mangin; A A Lammertsma; K Johnson; S Teipel; A Drzezga; A Bokde; O Colliot; H Bakardjian; H Zetterberg; B Dubois; B Vellas; L S Schneider; H Hampel Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014-12
Authors: Hee Jin Kim; Jeonghun Kim; Hanna Cho; Byoung Seok Ye; Cindy W Yoon; Young Noh; Geon Ha Kim; Jae Hong Lee; Jae Seung Kim; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung-Han Lee; Chang-Hun Kim; Sang Won Seo; Michael W Weiner; Duk L Na; Joon-Kyung Seong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hee Jin Kim; Seongbeom Park; Hanna Cho; Young Kyoung Jang; Jin San Lee; Hyemin Jang; Yeshin Kim; Ko Woon Kim; Young Hoon Ryu; Jae Yong Choi; Seung Hwan Moon; Michael W Weiner; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici; Charles DeCarli; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Tessandra Stewart; Min Shi; Aanchal Mehrotra; Patrick Aro; David Soltys; Kathleen F Kerr; Cyrus P Zabetian; Elaine R Peskind; Peggy Taylor; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Jing Zhang Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Hee Jin Kim; Kiho Im; Hunki Kwon; Jong-Min Lee; Changsoo Kim; Yeo Jin Kim; Na-Yeon Jung; Hanna Cho; Byoung Seok Ye; Young Noh; Geon Ha Kim; En-Da Ko; Jae Seung Kim; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung Han Lee; Sung Tae Kim; Jae Hong Lee; Michael Ewers; Michael W Weiner; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mi Ji Lee; Sang Won Seo; Duk L Na; Changsoo Kim; Jae Hyun Park; Geon Ha Kim; Chi Hun Kim; Young Noh; Hanna Cho; Hee Jin Kim; Cindy W Yoon; Byoung Seok Ye; Juhee Chin; Seun Jeon; Jong-Min Lee; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung-Han Lee; Jae Seung Kim; Sung Tae Kim; Jae-Hong Lee; Michael Ewers; David J Werring; Michael W Weiner Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.596