Literature DB >> 21592696

Comparative dental radiographic identification using flat panel CT.

Christoph G Birngruber1, Martin Obert, Frank Ramsthaler, Kerstin Kreutz, Marcel A Verhoff.   

Abstract

A skull without lower jaw was found and brought in for identification. It was suspected to be that of a man reported missing five years ago. An undated antemortal dental chart and two dental films of the 1st and 2nd dental quadrants, both taken about 4 years before the man went missing, were available for comparison. The method of choice in solving the identity question was comparative dental radiography. Despite numerous attempts, it was not possible to obtain radiographs of the upper jaw that duplicated the X-ray beam angulation of the antemortem dental films. The skull was thus scanned with a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scanner, and virtual radiographs with the desired angulation were generated from the data with the maximum intensity projection (MIP) technique. The resulting virtual radiographs could, however, not be used for superimposition with the antemortem radiographs because of their poor resolution and the occurrence of artifacts caused by metallic dental fillings. The upper jaw was therefore scanned again, this time with a high resolution eLU-CT (eXplore Locus Ultra flat panel CT). The resulting eLU-CT datasets were visualized with the MIP technique and yielded virtual radiographs that could be compared with the antemortem radiographs. Positive identification could be assumed with near certainty after dental features could be matched in the superimposition of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. In the presented case, eLU-CT was used for the first time for a comparative dental radiographic identification.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592696     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  4 in total

1.  Can mandibular lingual canals be used as a forensic fingerprint?

Authors:  Bassant Mowafey; Elke Van de Casteele; Jilan M Youssef; Ahmed R Zaher; Hany Omar; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Usefulness of 2D fusion of postmortem CT and antemortem chest radiography studies for human identification.

Authors:  Norihiro Shinkawa; Toshinori Hirai; Ryuichi Nishii; Nobuhiro Yukawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Extra-oral dental radiography for disaster victims using a flat panel X-ray detector and a hand-held X-ray generator.

Authors:  M Ohtani; T Oshima; S Mimasaka
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Analysis of laryngeal fractures in decomposed bodies using microfocus computed tomography (mfCT).

Authors:  Mattias Kettner; Stefan Potente; Boris Schulz; Peter Knauff; Peter H Schmidt; Frank Ramsthaler
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.