Literature DB >> 21592611

Comparison of treatment costs of grade 3/4 adverse events associated with erlotinib or pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Germany, France, Italy, and Spain.

Kurt Banz1, Helge Bischoff, Matthias Brunner, Christos Chouaid, Javier de Castro Carpeño, Filippo de Marinis, Francesco Grossi, Alain Vergnenègre, Stefan Walzer.   

Abstract

Objective of this indirect economic comparison was to estimate and compare management costs of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) reported for first-line erlotinib or pemetrexed maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The economic analysis was performed for Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Types and incidences of reported grade 3/4 AEs observed with erlotinib or pemetrexed maintenance therapy were retrieved from two recently published placebo-controlled trials. Country-specific estimates on standard treatment algorithms and incremental medical resource utilization associated with each of the reported grade 3/4 AEs have been obtained from clinical oncologists practicing in the four countries and co-authoring this article. The resource use items were subsequently assigned country-specific tariffs to estimate total per-patients costs associated with the AE profiles of the two compared maintenance regimens. For the economic analysis a customized economic spreadsheet model was employed. Our comparison shows lower total average per-patient AE management costs for erlotinib than for pemetrexed maintenance therapy in all four studied countries. Total estimated cost savings per patient in favour of erlotinib amount to € 121, € 237, € 106, and € 119 for Germany, France, Italy and Spain, respectively. These AE cost savings for erlotinib when compared to pemetrexed represent a decrease by 80%, 71%, 94%, and 82%, respectively. The study also discovered considerable differences in AE management costs across countries which are primarily due to differences in clinician's estimates of hospitalization referral rates. Erlotinib maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC causes lower AE management costs than pemetrexed maintenance therapy indicating a potentially superior tolerability profile.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592611     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  11 in total

1.  The impact of chemotherapy-induced side effects on medical care usage and cost in German hospital care--an observational analysis on non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Angela Ihbe-Heffinger; B Paessens; K Berger; M Shlaen; R Bernard; C von Schilling; C Peschel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Economic and clinical aspects of intravenous versus oral busulfan in adult patients for conditioning prior to HSCT.

Authors:  Karin Berger; Dorothee Schopohl; Christina Rieger; Helmut Ostermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of afatinib after platinum-based therapy for the treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in France.

Authors:  Maud Pignata; Christos Chouaid; Katell Le Lay; Laura Luciani; Ceilidh McConnachie; James Gordon; Stéphane Roze
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-10-25

4.  Cost analysis of adverse events associated with non-small cell lung cancer management in France.

Authors:  Christos Chouaid; Delphine Loirat; Emilie Clay; Aurélie Millier; Chloé Godard; Amira Fannan; Laurie Lévy-Bachelot; Eric Angevin
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-07-27

5.  Assessment of costs associated with adverse events in patients with cancer.

Authors:  William Wong; Yeun Mi Yim; Ashley Kim; Martin Cloutier; Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle; Patrick Gagnon-Sanschagrin; Annie Guerin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Understanding barriers to the introduction of precision medicines in non-small cell lung cancer: A qualitative interview protocol.

Authors:  Stuart Wright; Gavin Daker-White; William Newman; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-03-08

7.  Cost analysis of the management of brain metastases in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC: alectinib versus crizotinib.

Authors:  Dolores Isla; Bartomeu Massuti; Martín Lázaro; Lucía Ruiz de Alda; Rocio Gordo; Nuria Ortega-Joaquín; Itziar Oyagüez
Journal:  Lung Cancer Manag       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy.

Authors:  Bjoern Schwander; Simona Ravera; Giovanni Giuliani; Mark Nuijten; Stefan Walzer
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-09-03

9.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line induction and maintenance treatment sequences in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in France.

Authors:  Kaisa Taipale; Katherine B Winfree; Mark Boye; Mickael Basson; Ghassan Sleilaty; James Eaton; Rachel Evans; Christos Chouaid
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-08-16

10.  Cost-effectiveness of alectinib compared to crizotinib for the treatment of first-line ALK+ advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in France.

Authors:  Marine Sivignon; Rémi Monnier; Bertrand Tehard; Stéphane Roze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.