Literature DB >> 21592483

The effects of modeling simplifications on craniofacial finite element models: the alveoli (tooth sockets) and periodontal ligaments.

Sarah A Wood1, David S Strait, Elizabeth R Dumont, Callum F Ross, Ian R Grosse.   

Abstract

Several finite element models of a primate cranium were used to investigate the biomechanical effects of the tooth sockets and the material behavior of the periodontal ligament (PDL) on stress and strain patterns associated with feeding. For examining the effect of tooth sockets, the unloaded sockets were modeled as devoid of teeth and PDL, filled with teeth and PDLs, or simply filled with cortical bone. The third premolar on the left side of the cranium was loaded and the PDL was treated as an isotropic, linear elastic material using published values for Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio. The remaining models, along with one of the socket models, were used to determine the effect of the PDL's material behavior on stress and strain distributions under static premolar biting and dynamic tooth loading conditions. Two models (one static and the other dynamic) treated the PDL as cortical bone. The other two models treated it as a ligament with isotropic, linear elastic material properties. Two models treated the PDL as a ligament with hyperelastic properties, and the other two as a ligament with viscoelastic properties. Both behaviors were defined using published stress-strain data obtained from in vitro experiments on porcine ligament specimens. Von Mises stress and strain contour plots indicate that the effects of the sockets and PDL material behavior are local. Results from this study suggest that modeling the sockets and the PDL in finite element analyses of skulls is project dependent and can be ignored if values of stress and strain within the alveolar region are not required.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592483     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Isotropic Failure Criteria Are Not Appropriate for Anisotropic Fibrous Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Christopher E Korenczuk; Lauren E Votava; Rohit Y Dhume; Shannen B Kizilski; George E Brown; Rahul Narain; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of a rhesus macaque mandible during mastication.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; José Iriarte-Diaz; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Andrea B Taylor; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Sharifah F Aljunid; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Peter W Lucas; Shaji Michael; Ali Shekeban; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Richard H Madden; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; Sarah Wood; Christine Dzialo; Michael A Berthaume; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity.

Authors:  P G Cox; M J Fagan; E J Rayfield; N Jeffery
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The cranial biomechanics and feeding performance of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Rebecca W Cook; Antonino Vazzana; Rita Sorrentino; Stefano Benazzi; Amanda L Smith; David S Strait; Justin A Ledogar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  How does tooth cusp radius of curvature affect brittle food item processing?

Authors:  Michael A Berthaume; Elizabeth R Dumont; Laurie R Godfrey; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Validity and sensitivity of a human cranial finite element model: implications for comparative studies of biting performance.

Authors:  Viviana Toro-Ibacache; Laura C Fitton; Michael J Fagan; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Masticatory biomechanics of the Laotian rock rat, Laonastes aenigmamus, and the function of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Joanna Kirkham; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The importance of craniofacial sutures in biomechanical finite element models of the domestic pig.

Authors:  Jen A Bright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.