Literature DB >> 21592233

Incidental prostate cancer revisited: early outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Rafael Nunez1, Kimberly J Hurd, Brie N Noble, Erik P Castle, Paul E Andrews, Mitchell R Humphreys.   

Abstract

Incidental prostate cancer (PCa) after treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is becoming less common. This is a result of the changing patterns of BPH treatment. The purpose of the present research was to re-examine the clinical outcomes and importance of cT1a and cT1b PCa in a contemporary cohort after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). All patients with newly diagnosed PCa after HoLEP were retrospectively identified. Pre- and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy history, pathological features and disease progression were examined. Patients were matched to a control group with benign pathology for outcome comparisons. The database consisted of 240 consecutive patients, aged 52-90 years with prostate sizes from 25 to 375 cm(3) . A total of 28 patients were identified with incidental PCa (14 cT1a and 14 cT1b). Median follow up was 11 months and 13 months for cT1a and cT1b, respectively. Hospitalization time, catheterization time, complications and functional outcomes were similar. Three patients with cT1b required additional treatment as a result of PSA progression. All other cancers are being closely followed. The functional benefits of HoLEP are well established. The incidental PCa detection rate of 11.7% shows the potential benefit of pathological analysis. Just 10.7% of these patients received additional treatment, but this might be significant as these patients would otherwise go untreated. The impact on disease-specific survival and progression requires a longer follow up.
© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592233     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02776.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  10 in total

1.  HoLEP provides a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to bipolar TURP: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Rosenhammer; Eva M Lausenmeyer; Roman Mayr; Maximilian Burger; Christian Eichelberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prostate cancer detected after Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): significance of transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Sang Hoon Song; Ja Hyeon Ku; Seung-June Oh; Jae-Seung Paick
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Significance of prostate-specific antigen-related factors in incidental prostate cancer treated by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Satoshi Otsubo; Akira Yokomizo; Osamu Mochida; Masaki Shiota; Katsunori Tatsugami; Junich Inokuchi; Seiji Naito
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: comparison between incidental tumors vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Mattia Luca Piccinelli; Stefano Luzzago; Giulia Marvaso; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Noriyoshi Miura; Victor M Schuettfort; Keiichiro Mori; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Matteo Ferro; Francesco A Mistretta; Nicola Fusco; Giuseppe Petralia; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Kerstin Wegner; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Buchner; Philipp Weinhold; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Giuseppe Magistro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Incidental prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: incidence and predictive factors for clinical progression.

Authors:  Clément Klein; Thibault Marquette; Grégoire Capon; Mokrane Yacoub; Eric Alezra; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Franck Bladou; Grégoire Robert
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Preoperative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a safe clinical practice to reduce incidental prostate cancer in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Angelo Porreca; Marco Giampaoli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Daniele D'Agostino; Daniele Romagnoli; Federico Mineo Bianchi; Alessandro Del Rosso; Paolo Corsi; Riccardo Schiavina; Walter Artibani; Eugenio Brunocilla
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24

8.  The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?

Authors:  Jens Köllermann; Benedikt Hoeh; Daniel Ruppel; Kevin Smith; Henning Reis; Mike Wenzel; Felix Preisser; Marina Kosiba; Philipp Mandel; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andreas Becker; Felix K H Chun; Peter Wild; Luis A Kluth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.535

9.  Outcome of Patients With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Receiving Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Authors:  Hahn-Ey Lee; ByungWon Kim; Hyun Sik Yoon; Jungyo Suh; Seung-June Oh
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Best laser for prostatectomy in the year 2013.

Authors:  Pankaj N Maheshwari; Nitin Joshi; Reeta P Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.