CONTEXT: The State Reportable Conditions Assessment (SRCA) is an annual assessment of reporting requirements for reportable public health conditions. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have gained valuable experience in developing a centralized repository of information about reportable conditions across US states and territories. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the reporting status in states of nationally notifiable conditions used to inform public health and national surveillance initiatives. DESIGN: Conditions included in SRCA are updated annually by using a Web-based tool created by the CSTE. SETTING: SRCA information for 2008 was reported from all US states, 2 cities, and 4 territories. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents included state or territorial epidemiologists (or designees) for reporting jurisdictions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Conditions were classified as explicitly reportable, implicitly reportable, or not reportable. RESULTS were tabulated to determine reporting statistics for the conditions nationwide. RESULTS: The SRCA included 101 conditions recommended for national notification: 93 (92%) were infectious conditions, and 8 (8%) were other (noninfectious or crosscutting) conditions. Of nationally notifiable infectious conditions, 61 (66%) were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions; only 2 (25%) noninfectious or crosscutting nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions. Furthermore, 3 nationally notifiable infectious conditions were explicitly reportable in less than 70% of jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS: Although most nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable, we found that many of these conditions have implicit reporting authority in states. As notifiable condition surveillance moves toward an informatics-driven approach, automated electronic case-detection systems will need explicit information about what conditions are reportable. Future work should address the feasibility of standardizing the format of reportable disease lists and nomenclature used to facilitate data aggregation and interpretation across states.
CONTEXT: The State Reportable Conditions Assessment (SRCA) is an annual assessment of reporting requirements for reportable public health conditions. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have gained valuable experience in developing a centralized repository of information about reportable conditions across US states and territories. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the reporting status in states of nationally notifiable conditions used to inform public health and national surveillance initiatives. DESIGN: Conditions included in SRCA are updated annually by using a Web-based tool created by the CSTE. SETTING: SRCA information for 2008 was reported from all US states, 2 cities, and 4 territories. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents included state or territorial epidemiologists (or designees) for reporting jurisdictions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Conditions were classified as explicitly reportable, implicitly reportable, or not reportable. RESULTS were tabulated to determine reporting statistics for the conditions nationwide. RESULTS: The SRCA included 101 conditions recommended for national notification: 93 (92%) were infectious conditions, and 8 (8%) were other (noninfectious or crosscutting) conditions. Of nationally notifiable infectious conditions, 61 (66%) were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions; only 2 (25%) noninfectious or crosscutting nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable in 90% or more jurisdictions. Furthermore, 3 nationally notifiable infectious conditions were explicitly reportable in less than 70% of jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS: Although most nationally notifiable conditions were explicitly reportable, we found that many of these conditions have implicit reporting authority in states. As notifiable condition surveillance moves toward an informatics-driven approach, automated electronic case-detection systems will need explicit information about what conditions are reportable. Future work should address the feasibility of standardizing the format of reportable disease lists and nomenclature used to facilitate data aggregation and interpretation across states.
Authors: Richard N Danila; Ellen S Laine; Franci Livingston; Kathryn Como-Sabetti; Lauren Lamers; Kelli Johnson; Anne M Barry Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael Klompas; Jason McVetta; Ross Lazarus; Emma Eggleston; Gillian Haney; Benjamin A Kruskal; W Katherine Yih; Patricia Daly; Paul Oppedisano; Brianne Beagan; Michael Lee; Chaim Kirby; Dawn Heisey-Grove; Alfred DeMaria; Richard Platt Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Scott Santibañez; Philip M Polgreen; Susan E Beekmann; Catherine Cairns; Gregory A Filice; Marcelle Layton; James M Hughes Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Daniel R Newman; James Matthias; Mohammad M Rahman; Antoine Brantley; Thomas A Peterman Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Christine C Johnson; Suzanne L Havstad; Dennis R Ownby; Christine L M Joseph; Alexandra R Sitarik; Jocelyn Biagini Myers; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Tina V Hartert; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey; Daniel J Jackson; Robert F Lemanske; Lisa J Martin; Edward M Zoratti; Cynthia M Visness; Patrick H Ryan; Diane R Gold; Fernando D Martinez; Rachel L Miller; Christine M Seroogy; Anne L Wright; James E Gern Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Adam Bennett; Anton L V Avanceña; Jennifer Wegbreit; Chris Cotter; Kathryn Roberts; Roly Gosling Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Anna Barry Cope; Kyle T Bernstein; James Matthias; Mohammad Rahman; Jill C Diesel; River A Pugsley; Julia A Schillinger; Rilene A Chew Ng; Ellen J Klingler; Victoria L Mobley; Erika Samoff; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.868