Mario Schootman1, Anjali D Deshpande, Sandi L Pruitt, Donna B Jeffe. 1. Division of Health Behavior Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8504, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA. mschootm@dom.wustl.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined the association of neighborhood foreclosure risk on the health status of a statewide sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 1047) and the extent to which covariates accounted for observed associations. METHODS: Measures of self-rated health and several covariates were obtained by telephone interview 1 year after diagnosis. We used the federal Housing and Urban Development agency's estimated census-tract foreclosure-abandonment-risk score and multilevel, logistic regression to determine the association of foreclosure risk (high, moderate versus low) with self-rated health (fair-poor versus good, very good, excellent) and whether covariates could explain the observed association. RESULTS: Women who resided in high-foreclosure-risk (HFR) areas were 2.39 times (95% CI: 1.83-3.13) more likely to report being in fair-poor health than women who lived in low-foreclosure-risk areas. The odds ratio (OR) was reduced for women who lived in high-foreclosure-risk versus low-foreclosure-risk areas after adjusting for income (HFR OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.01-3.15), physical activity (HFR OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.98-3.08), and perceived neighborhood conditions (HFR OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02-3.05). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors who lived in census tracts with high- versus low-foreclosure risk reported poorer health status. This association was explained by differences in household income, physical activity, and perceived neighborhood conditions.
PURPOSE: We determined the association of neighborhood foreclosure risk on the health status of a statewide sample of breast cancer survivors (n = 1047) and the extent to which covariates accounted for observed associations. METHODS: Measures of self-rated health and several covariates were obtained by telephone interview 1 year after diagnosis. We used the federal Housing and Urban Development agency's estimated census-tract foreclosure-abandonment-risk score and multilevel, logistic regression to determine the association of foreclosure risk (high, moderate versus low) with self-rated health (fair-poor versus good, very good, excellent) and whether covariates could explain the observed association. RESULTS:Women who resided in high-foreclosure-risk (HFR) areas were 2.39 times (95% CI: 1.83-3.13) more likely to report being in fair-poor health than women who lived in low-foreclosure-risk areas. The odds ratio (OR) was reduced for women who lived in high-foreclosure-risk versus low-foreclosure-risk areas after adjusting for income (HFR OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.01-3.15), physical activity (HFR OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.98-3.08), and perceived neighborhood conditions (HFR OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02-3.05). CONCLUSIONS:Breast cancer survivors who lived in census tracts with high- versus low-foreclosure risk reported poorer health status. This association was explained by differences in household income, physical activity, and perceived neighborhood conditions.
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mariana Arcaya; M Maria Glymour; Prabal Chakrabarti; Nicholas A Christakis; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Scarlett Lin Gomez; Salma Shariff-Marco; Mindy DeRouen; Theresa H M Keegan; Irene H Yen; Mahasin Mujahid; William A Satariano; Sally L Glaser Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Paul J Christine; Kari Moore; Natalie D Crawford; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez; Brisa N Sánchez; Teresa Seeman; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jessica R Gorman; H Irene Su; John P Pierce; Samantha C Roberts; Sally A Dominick; Vanessa L Malcarne Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tess Thompson; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Maria Pérez; James Struthers; Julianne A Sefko; Min Lian; Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Mario Schootman; Anjali D Deshpande; Michael T Lynskey; Sandi L Pruitt; Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2012-04-18
Authors: Sandi L Pruitt; Amy McQueen; Anjali D Deshpande; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 2.506