| Literature DB >> 21589717 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intent of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of massage therapy in the rehabilitation of post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patellofemoral pain syndrome. The primary complications following surgical repair of the anterior cruciate ligament-classified as patellofemoral pain syndrome-are hamstring flexion contracture and quadriceps weakness, leading to patellofemoral dysfunction and retropatellar pain.Entities:
Keywords: ACL rehabilitation; knee joint flexion contractures; patellofemoral dysfunction; patellofemoral pain syndrome; retropatellar knee pain
Year: 2008 PMID: 21589717 PMCID: PMC3091451 DOI: 10.3822/ijtmb.v1i2.22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Ther Massage Bodywork
Figure 1.Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS)(.
VMO = vastus medialis oblique; ML = vastus lateralis.
Figure 2.Casual relationship of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury–induced patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). ROM = range of motion; VMO = vastus medialis oblique; ML = vastus lateralis.
Functional Numerical Pain Scale(
| 0 | No pain |
| 1–3 | Pain that does not require change in activity |
| 4–6 | Pain that does require change in activity |
| 7–9 | Pain that fully prohibits one or more activities |
| 10 | Pain that is unbearable |
The Kendall Key to Muscle Grading(
| No movement | No contraction seen or felt | 0 |
| Tendon becomes prominent, or feeble contraction is felt, but no visible movement | T (trace) | |
| Supported in the horizontal plane | Movement through partial range of motion | 1 |
| Movement through complete range of motion | 2 | |
| Holds against slight pressure in test position | 3 | |
| Tests in the antigravity position | Moves through partial range of motion against gravity | 3 |
| Gradual release from test position | 4 | |
| Holds test position (no added resistance) | 5 | |
| Holds test position against slight pressure | 6 | |
| Holds test position against slight-to-moderate pressure | 7 | |
| Holds test position against moderate pressure | 8 | |
| Holds test position against moderate-to-strong pressure | 9 | |
| Holds test position against strong pressure | 10 | |
Figure 3.Subject-reported pre- and post-massage pain level (PL) on a 0 – 10 scale for each session. Spikes in pre-massage pain level at session 2 correspond to postsurgical pain. Session 4 pre-massage pain level was associated with a return to road biking.
Figure 4.Pre- and post-massage heel-height difference, measuring degree of hamstring flexion contracture.
Figure 5.Anthropometric measurements tracking effusion and atrophy pre- and post surgery. Note the decrease in effusion following application of lymphatic drainage (LD) during session 2. Also note the atrophy of right quadriceps as compared with left quadriceps before surgery.
Figure 6.(Left panel) Pre– and (right panel) post–lymphatic drainage given 4 days post surgery.