Literature DB >> 21589393

4-Amino-pyridinium azide 4-amino-pyridine solvate.

Hui-Fen Qian, Wei Huang.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(5)H(7)N(2) (+)·N(3) (-)·C(5)H(6)N(2), all N atoms of the azide anion are situated on a twofold rotational axis, so the 4-amino-pyridinium cation and 4-amino-pyridine mol-ecule, being related by symmetry, occupy one position in the asymmetric unit. Inter-molecular N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds generate a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network which consolidates the crystal packing.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21589393      PMCID: PMC3011494          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810044843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a related compound, see: Teulon et al. (1985 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H7N2n class="Chemical">N3 −·C5H6N2 M = 231.27 Monoclinic, a = 7.507 (3) Å b = 12.247 (5) Å c = 13.634 (5) Å β = 99.278 (5)° V = 1237.0 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 291 K 0.14 × 0.11 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.988, T max = 0.992 3027 measured reflections 1096 independent reflections 852 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.072

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.105 S = 1.08 1096 reflections 80 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAIn class="Chemical">NT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810044843/cv2787sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810044843/cv2787Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H7N2+·N3·C5H6N2F(000) = 488
Mr = 231.27Dx = 1.242 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 1359 reflections
a = 7.507 (3) Åθ = 3.0–25.4°
b = 12.247 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 13.634 (5) ÅT = 291 K
β = 99.278 (5)°Block, colourless
V = 1237.0 (8) Å30.14 × 0.11 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer1096 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube852 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.072
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.988, Tmax = 0.992k = −12→14
3027 measured reflectionsl = −16→15
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.105w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0493P)2 + 0.0478P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1096 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.11 e Å3
80 parametersΔρmin = −0.11 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.042 (5)
Experimental. The structure was solved by direct methods (Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C10.1721 (2)0.05406 (12)−0.09812 (12)0.0879 (5)
H10.23210.0033−0.13160.106*
C20.22248 (18)0.06466 (10)0.00146 (11)0.0780 (4)
H20.31450.02140.03500.094*
C30.13523 (16)0.14103 (10)0.05345 (9)0.0699 (4)
C4−0.00162 (18)0.20282 (11)−0.00180 (11)0.0791 (4)
H4−0.06350.25470.02940.095*
C5−0.0439 (2)0.18672 (13)−0.10131 (12)0.0932 (5)
H5−0.13550.2286−0.13710.112*
N10.18164 (16)0.15416 (9)0.15211 (9)0.0858 (4)
H1A0.12650.20160.18280.103*
H1B0.26650.11510.18460.103*
N20.04055 (19)0.11306 (11)−0.15027 (9)0.0948 (4)
H2A0.01080.1042−0.21340.114*0.50
N30.5000−0.02503 (17)0.75000.1009 (6)
N40.50000.07152 (17)0.75000.0760 (5)
N50.50000.16656 (17)0.75000.1062 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0948 (10)0.0867 (9)0.0891 (8)−0.0181 (8)0.0353 (8)−0.0118 (8)
C20.0744 (8)0.0752 (8)0.0879 (8)−0.0108 (6)0.0231 (6)−0.0057 (6)
C30.0681 (7)0.0682 (7)0.0762 (9)−0.0163 (6)0.0206 (6)−0.0037 (6)
C40.0765 (8)0.0799 (8)0.0834 (9)−0.0071 (6)0.0205 (7)−0.0009 (7)
C50.0938 (10)0.1000 (11)0.0854 (11)−0.0100 (8)0.0132 (8)0.0090 (8)
N10.0900 (8)0.0873 (8)0.0803 (8)0.0016 (5)0.0144 (6)−0.0086 (6)
N20.1105 (10)0.1050 (9)0.0714 (8)−0.0251 (7)0.0223 (7)−0.0032 (7)
N30.0964 (13)0.0868 (12)0.1185 (15)0.0000.0141 (10)0.000
N40.0626 (9)0.0993 (13)0.0671 (9)0.0000.0139 (6)0.000
N50.1123 (14)0.0918 (14)0.1242 (16)0.0000.0488 (12)0.000
C1—N21.333 (2)C4—H40.9300
C1—C21.356 (2)C5—N21.341 (2)
C1—H10.9300C5—H50.9300
C2—C31.3985 (18)N1—H1A0.8600
C2—H20.9300N1—H1B0.8600
C3—N11.3437 (17)N2—H2A0.8600
C3—C41.395 (2)N3—N41.182 (3)
C4—C51.357 (2)N4—N51.164 (2)
N2—C1—C2123.06 (14)C3—C4—H4120.2
N2—C1—H1118.5N2—C5—C4122.83 (15)
C2—C1—H1118.5N2—C5—H5118.6
C1—C2—C3119.58 (14)C4—C5—H5118.6
C1—C2—H2120.2C3—N1—H1A120.0
C3—C2—H2120.2C3—N1—H1B120.0
N1—C3—C4121.68 (12)H1A—N1—H1B120.0
N1—C3—C2121.36 (13)C1—N2—C5117.93 (13)
C4—C3—C2116.97 (13)C1—N2—H2A121.0
C5—C4—C3119.63 (14)C5—N2—H2A121.0
C5—C4—H4120.2N5—N4—N3180.000 (1)
N2—C1—C2—C3−0.5 (2)C2—C3—C4—C50.10 (18)
C1—C2—C3—N1−179.81 (11)C3—C4—C5—N20.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.11 (17)C2—C1—N2—C50.6 (2)
N1—C3—C4—C5−179.98 (11)C4—C5—N2—C1−0.3 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···N5i0.862.153.008 (2)174
N1—H1B···N3ii0.862.142.9942 (18)172
N2—H2A···N2iii0.861.842.689 (3)169
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯N5i0.862.153.008 (2)174
N1—H1B⋯N3ii0.862.142.9942 (18)172
N2—H2A⋯N2iii0.861.842.689 (3)169

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  A long symmetric N⋯H⋯N hydrogen bond in bis-(4-amino-pyridinium)(1+) azide(1-): redetermination from the original data.

Authors:  Jan Fábry
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.