Literature DB >> 21589244

Bis(2-hy-droxy-ethanaminium) tetra-chloridopalladate(II).

Ilia A Guzei, Lara C Spencer, Margaret Yankey, James Darkwa.   

Abstract

In the title compound, (C(2)H(8)NO)(2)[PdCl(4)], 2-hy-droxy-ethanaminium cations and tetra-chloridopalladate(II) dianions crystallize in a 2:1 ratio with the anion residing on a crystallographic inversion center. The cations and anions are linked in a complex three-dimensional framework by three types of strong hydrogen bonds (N-H⋯O, N-H⋯Cl, and O-H⋯Cl), which form various ring and chain patterns of up to the ternary graph-set level.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21589244      PMCID: PMC3011756          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810045435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the hydrolysis of imines in Schiff base first-row transition metal complexes, see: Chattopadhyay et al. (2007 ▶); Czaun et al. (2010 ▶); Guzei et al. (2010 ▶); Lee et al. (1948 ▶). For the use of Schiff base first-row transition metal complexes as amine protecting groups, see: Deng et al. (2002 ▶); Kurita (2001 ▶); Shelley et al. (1999 ▶). For geometrical parameter checks, see: Bruno et al. (2004 ▶). For R factor comparisons, see: Allen (2002 ▶). For graph-set notation, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C2H8NO)2[PdCl4] M = 372.39 Monoclinic, a = 8.9401 (4) Å b = 8.1621 (4) Å c = 8.5921 (4) Å β = 103.445 (2)° V = 609.78 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.37 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.536, T max = 0.871 14744 measured reflections 1851 independent reflections 1769 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.012 wR(F 2) = 0.028 S = 0.98 1851 reflections 62 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.50 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL, OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶) and FCF_filter (Guzei 2007 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL, publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶) and modiCIFer (Guzei, 2007 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810045435/nk2068sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810045435/nk2068Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C2H8NO)2[PdCl4]F(000) = 368
Mr = 372.39Dx = 2.028 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 9951 reflections
a = 8.9401 (4) Åθ = 3.4–30.6°
b = 8.1621 (4) ŵ = 2.37 mm1
c = 8.5921 (4) ÅT = 100 K
β = 103.445 (2)°Block, orange
V = 609.78 (5) Å30.30 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART APEXII area-detector diffractometer1769 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
mirror opticsRint = 0.024
0.60° ω and 0.6° φ scansθmax = 30.6°, θmin = 3.4°
Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.536, Tmax = 0.871k = −11→11
14744 measured reflectionsl = −12→12
1851 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.012Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.028H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0111P)2 + 0.3119P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1851 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
62 parametersΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.50 e Å3
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pd11.00001.00000.50000.00979 (3)
Cl10.73683 (3)0.96899 (3)0.46100 (3)0.01355 (5)
Cl21.04022 (3)0.81392 (3)0.70777 (3)0.01331 (5)
O10.57008 (9)0.31533 (9)0.44982 (9)0.01677 (15)
H10.61470.22450.45270.025*
N10.74116 (10)0.59194 (11)0.58009 (10)0.01328 (16)
H1A0.64910.64490.55700.016*
H1C0.81770.66500.61850.016*
H1B0.74040.51350.65520.016*
C10.62509 (12)0.42371 (14)0.34444 (12)0.01645 (19)
H1E0.54380.50410.29870.020*
H1D0.64870.36000.25510.020*
C20.76792 (13)0.51374 (13)0.43181 (13)0.01585 (19)
H2A0.85490.43590.46040.019*
H2B0.79510.59880.36100.019*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pd10.00874 (5)0.00986 (5)0.01049 (5)0.00005 (3)0.00164 (3)−0.00051 (3)
Cl10.01008 (10)0.01379 (10)0.01650 (11)0.00018 (8)0.00250 (8)0.00104 (8)
Cl20.01270 (10)0.01301 (10)0.01342 (10)−0.00109 (8)0.00143 (8)0.00129 (7)
O10.0146 (3)0.0126 (3)0.0239 (4)0.0011 (3)0.0062 (3)0.0002 (3)
N10.0124 (4)0.0126 (4)0.0146 (4)−0.0007 (3)0.0028 (3)0.0006 (3)
C10.0148 (4)0.0202 (5)0.0141 (4)0.0002 (4)0.0029 (4)−0.0009 (4)
C20.0136 (4)0.0199 (5)0.0153 (4)−0.0011 (4)0.0059 (4)−0.0009 (4)
Pd1—Cl22.3074 (2)N1—H1B0.9100
Pd1—Cl12.3119 (3)C1—C21.5127 (15)
O1—C11.4322 (13)C1—H1E0.9900
O1—H10.8400C1—H1D0.9900
N1—C21.4932 (13)C2—H2A0.9900
N1—H1A0.9100C2—H2B0.9900
N1—H1C0.9100
Cl2i—Pd1—Cl189.409 (8)C2—C1—H1E109.4
Cl2—Pd1—Cl190.591 (9)O1—C1—H1D109.4
C1—O1—H1109.5C2—C1—H1D109.4
C2—N1—H1A109.5H1E—C1—H1D108.0
C2—N1—H1C109.5N1—C2—C1110.29 (8)
H1A—N1—H1C109.5N1—C2—H2A109.6
C2—N1—H1B109.5C1—C2—H2A109.6
H1A—N1—H1B109.5N1—C2—H2B109.6
H1C—N1—H1B109.5C1—C2—H2B109.6
O1—C1—C2111.14 (8)H2A—C2—H2B108.1
O1—C1—H1E109.4
O1—C1—C2—N1−51.28 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.911.972.8370 (12)158
O1—H1···Cl1iii0.842.353.1869 (8)179
N1—H1C···Cl20.912.303.2048 (9)170
Pd1—Cl22.3074 (2)
Pd1—Cl12.3119 (3)
Cl2i—Pd1—Cl189.409 (8)
Cl2—Pd1—Cl190.591 (9)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1ii0.911.972.8370 (12)158
O1—H1⋯Cl1iii0.842.353.1869 (8)179
N1—H1C⋯Cl20.912.303.2048 (9)170

Symmetry codes: (ii) ; (iii) .

  6 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Retrieval of crystallographically-derived molecular geometry information.

Authors:  Ian J Bruno; Jason C Cole; Magnus Kessler; Jie Luo; W D Sam Motherwell; Lucy H Purkis; Barry R Smith; Robin Taylor; Richard I Cooper; Stephanie E Harris; A Guy Orpen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Constructor graph description of the hydrogen-bonding supramolecular assembly in two ionic compounds: 2-(pyrazol-1-yl)ethylammonium chloride and diaquadichloridobis(2-hydroxyethylammonium)cobalt(II) dichloride.

Authors:  Ilia A Guzei; Lara C Spencer; Michael K Ainooson; James Darkwa
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Stereo-specific cytotoxic effects of gossypol enantiomers and gossypolone in tumour cell lines.

Authors:  M D Shelley; L Hartley; R G Fish; P Groundwater; J J Morgan; D Mort; M Mason; A Evans
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Reaction of ferrous and ferric ions with 1,10-phenanthroline; kinetics of formation and dissociation of ferrous phenanthroline.

Authors:  T S LEE; I M KOLTHOFF; D L LEUSSING
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1948-11       Impact factor: 15.419

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.